Abstract
This article examines how female university students perceive algorithmic personalization as shaping gendered visibility in digital security communication. Drawing on postdigital feminism and feminist security studies, it conceptualises perceived algorithmic visibility as a postdigital security condition through which users interpret which bodies, voices, and critiques become more or less legible in militarized digital spaces. Empirically, the study is based on an online survey with 425 female university students in Croatia. The questionnaire measured subjective algorithmic awareness, institutional media trust, feminist engagement, and reported encounters with security-related content, and included open-ended questions on participants’ perceptions of algorithmically mediated security communication. Statistical analyses identify four user segments—mainstream security consumers, neutral observers, critical analysts, and digital activists—who differ in levels of trust, subjective algorithmic awareness, and feminist engagement. Results show that 72% of respondents report primarily encountering security narratives through social media feeds they perceive as algorithmically curated, while active information seeking is rare. Higher institutional trust is associated with lower subjective algorithmic awareness, whereas greater subjective algorithmic awareness correlates with feminist engagement and scepticism toward mainstream military narratives. Qualitative responses indicate that participants perceive feminist security perspectives as less visible in their feeds and describe a dominance of state-centered and militarized content. The article argues that, in postdigital security publics, algorithmic systems are not only technical infrastructures but are also perceived and anticipated as epistemic actors that shape users’ sense of visibility, legitimacy, and communicative agency. It calls for critical algorithmic literacy, more accountable platform governance, and feminist-informed policy approaches that safeguard epistemic diversity in postdigital security communication.
- Acar, E. (2025). From welcome to surveillance: Intersecting experiences of visibility and vulnerability among international students in the United States. European Journal of Education & Language Review, 1(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/17571
- Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Culture, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-12-1-1
- Atkins, L. C., & Grant, S. B. (2022). Diverse applications of sociological imagination: A qualitative study of service-learning mentoring. Journal of Applied Social Science, 16(1), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 19367244211021390
- Back, L., & Puwar, N. (Eds.). (2012). Live methods. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002772
- Barnetz, Z. (2015). The role of radical imagination in social work education, practice, and research. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 35(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2015.1028607
- Bassett, C. (2015). Not now? Feminism, technology, postdigital. In D. M. Berry & M. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design (pp. 136–150). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/ 9781137437204_11
- Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Polity Press.
- Bloch, E. (1986). The principle of hope (N. Plaice, S. Plaice, & P. Knight, Trans.; Vol. 1). MIT Press. (Original work published 1959)
- Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press.
- Buch, A., Lindberg, Y., & Cerratto Pargman, T. (Eds.). (2024). Framing futures in postdigital education: Critical concepts for data-driven practices. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58622-4
- Bucher, T. (2018). If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/ 9780190493028.001.0001
- Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society (K. Blamey, Trans.). Polity Press. (Original work published 1975)
- Chowdhury, R., & Lakshmi, D. (2023). “Your opinion doesn’t matter, anyway”: Exposing technology-facilitated gender-based violence in an era of generative AI. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387483
- Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12(4), 687–718. https://doi.org/10.1086/494362
- Costello, E., McDonald, J., Macgilchrist, F., Jandrić, P., Carbonel, H., Crighton, S., Buch, A., & Peters, M. A. (2025). Speculative practicescapes of learning design and dreaming. Postdigital Science and Education, 7(2), 560–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00465-5
- Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
- D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/ 11805.001.0001
- Duncanson, C. (2013). Forces for good? Military masculinities and peacebuilding in Afghanistan and Iraq. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Eichler, M. (2012). Militarizing men: Gender, conscription, and war in post-Soviet Russia. Stanford University Press.
- Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The international politics of militarizing women’s lives. University of California Press.
- Eskola, A. (1988). Blind alleys in social psychology. North-Holland.
- Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2023). Digital feeling. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23562-7
- Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12075
- Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media.Yale University Press.
- Gombar, M. (2025). The paradox of trust in digital platforms: Algorithmic awareness in digital interactions. Revija za sociologiju, 55(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.55.2.2
- Gombar, M., & Boban, M. (2026). Algorithmic awareness and digital responsibility: The role of platform trust and digital literacy. Business Systems Research, 17(1), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2026-0009
- Graeber, D. (2009). Direct action. AK Press.
- Gupta, A. (2026). Bodies under scanner: AI, surveillance, and gendered resistance in Manjula Padmanabhan’s Harvest. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence and Society, 2(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/ 10.20897/jirais/18487
- Haiven, M., & Khasnabish, A. (2014). The radical imagination: Social movement research in the age of austerity. Zed Books.
- Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
- Hesse-Biber, S. N. (Ed.). (2014). Feminist research practice: A primer (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/ 10.4135/9781071909911
- Hrastinski, S., & Jandrić, P. (2023). Imagining education futures: Researchers as fiction authors. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(3), 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00403-x
- Hunt, K., & Rygiel, K. (Eds.). (2006). (En)gendering the War on Terror: War stories and camouflaged politics. Ashgate.
- Hurley, Z. (2023). Postdigital feminism(s). In P. Jandrić (Ed.), Encyclopedia of postdigital science and education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_42-1
- Jacobsen, M., Drake, M., & Petersen, A. (Eds.). (2016). Imaginative methodologies in the social sciences: Creativity, poetics, and rhetoric in social research. Routledge.
- Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000
- Jandrić, P., Luke, T. W., Sturm, S., McLaren, P., Jackson, L., MacKenzie, A., Tesar, M., Stewart, G. T., Roberts, P., Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Sinfield, S., Jaldemark, J., Peters, M. A., Sinclair, C., & Gibbons, A. (2023). Collective writing: The continuous struggle for meaning-making. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(3), 851–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00320-5
- Jandrić, P., Tolbert, S., Hayes, S., & Jopling, M. (2025). Postdigital citizen science: Mapping the field. Postdigital Science and Education, 7(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00443-3
- Kara, H. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Policy Press. https://doi.org/ 10.51952/9781447320258
- Kind, A. (Ed.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of philosophy of imagination. Routledge.
- Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802793
- Levy, A., & Godfrey-Smith, P. (Eds.). (2020). The scientific imagination: Philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190212308.001.0001
- Lindberg, Y., & Johansson, S. (2023). Postdigital educational futures. In P. Jandrić (Ed.), Encyclopedia of postdigital science and education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_39-1
- Macgilchrist, F., Jarke, J., Allert, H., & Cerratto Pargman, T. (2024). Design beyond design thinking: Designing postdigital futures when weaving worlds with others. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00447-z
- Mills, C. W. (2000). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1959)
- Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-p6es-hb13
- Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
- Oyewole, O. (2026). Media literacy and peer collaboration as predictors of civic engagement among pre-service teachers in Oyo State. Asia Pacific Journal of Education and Society, 14(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10. 20897/apjes/18502
- Palmer, N. (2023). The sociological imagination within teaching sociology: 1973–2020. Teaching Sociology, 51(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X221098452
- Parashar, S. (2014). Women and militant wars: The politics of injury. Routledge.
- Raza, F. A., Singh, A. D., Anwar, R., Kovilpillai, J. J. S., Hamdan, A. B., Konno, F., Rajaratnam, V., Raman, M., & Razami, H. H. (2026). Gender and functional differentiation in generative AI usage among Malaysian higher education student. European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.20897/ ejsteme/18267
- Rohrer, I., & Thompson, M. (2023). Imagination theory: Anthropological perspectives. Anthropological Theory, 23(2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996221129117
- Ross, J. (2022). Digital futures for learning: Speculative methods and pedagogies. Routledge.
- Ross, J. (2023). Postdigital speculation. In P. Jandrić (Ed.), Encyclopedia of postdigital science and education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_19-1
- Sandvig, C., Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., & Langbort, C. (2014, May 22). Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms [Paper presentation]. Data and Discrimination: Converting Critical Concerns into Productive Inquiry, Seattle, WA, United States.
- Shepherd, L. J. (2008). Gender, violence, and security: Discourse as practice. Zed Books.
- Sjoberg, L. (2010). Women fighters and the “beautiful soul” narrative. International Review of the Red Cross, 92(877), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383110000027
- Sjoberg, L., & Gentry, C. E. (2007). Mothers, monsters, whores: Women’s violence in global politics. Zed Books.
- Suoranta, J., Teräs, M., Teräs, H., Jandrić, P., Ledger, S., Macgilchrist, F., & Prinsloo, P. (2022). Speculative social science fiction of digitalization in higher education: From what is to what could be. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00260-6
- Suzor, N. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612068
- wessalowski, N., Lange, G. M., & Kannengießer, S. (2025). A feminist critique of cybersecurity: Technofeminist imaginaries of vulnerability and care. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(2), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16783
- Whitworth, S. (2004). Men, militarism, and UN peacekeeping: A gendered analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Gombar & Cvitković, 2026)
Reference: Gombar, M., & Cvitković, M. K. (2026). Algorithmic visibility and gendered security discourses in postdigital communication: From digital camouflage to feminist resistance.
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(2), Article 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18718
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Gombar M, Cvitković MK. Algorithmic visibility and gendered security discourses in postdigital communication: From digital camouflage to feminist resistance.
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(2), 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18718
Chicago
In-text citation: (Gombar and Cvitković, 2026)
Reference: Gombar, Marija, and Maja Križanec Cvitković. "Algorithmic visibility and gendered security discourses in postdigital communication: From digital camouflage to feminist resistance".
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 2026 10 no. 2 (2026): 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18718
Harvard
In-text citation: (Gombar and Cvitković, 2026)
Reference: Gombar, M., and Cvitković, M. K. (2026). Algorithmic visibility and gendered security discourses in postdigital communication: From digital camouflage to feminist resistance.
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(2), 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18718
MLA
In-text citation: (Gombar and Cvitković, 2026)
Reference: Gombar, Marija et al. "Algorithmic visibility and gendered security discourses in postdigital communication: From digital camouflage to feminist resistance".
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, 2026, 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18718
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Gombar M, Cvitković MK. Algorithmic visibility and gendered security discourses in postdigital communication: From digital camouflage to feminist resistance. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(2):11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18718