Abstract
Alevis are a persecuted ethno-religious community based in Turkey whose members have settled in various European countries since the 1960s. From the early years of the Turkish Republic, the broader Alevi community has witnessed through media the massacres that have befallen some of their members. The paper analyses Alevi media witnessing through two cases: Madımak (1993) and Sürgü (2012). While witnessing the Madımak massacre through mainstream Turkish media mobilised members of the community to form the Alevi movement, witnessing the attack on a family through Alevi media enabled them to prevent the massacre. Examining the cases of Madımak and Sürgü, the paper calls for a decolonial and intersectional approach to media witnessing. Critically engaging with the concept of media witnessing, the paper argues that the political potentials of media witnessing are mainly activated through drawing on collective memories of violence and atrocities. It also demonstrates the limitations of the political potentials of media witnessing without employing an intersectional lens towards different systems of power based on gender, ethnicity and so on.
- Ahmed. S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
- Altınay, A. G., Contreras, M. H., Hirsch, M., Howard, J., Karaca, B., & Solomon, A. (2019). Women mobilizing memory. Columbia University Press.
- Ateş, K. (2011). Yurttaşlığın kıyısında aleviler: ‘Öz türkler’ ve ‘heretik ötekiler’. Phoenix.
- Brennan, T. (2004). The transmission of affect. Cornell University Press.
- Bruinessen, M. V. (2016). Alevi kürtlerin etnik kimliği üzerine tartışma: “Aslını inkar eden haramzadedir!”, in Kürtlük, türklük, alevilik: Etnik ve dinsel kimlik mücadeleleri (pp. 87–114). İletişim.
- Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
- Carlse, J. E. (2020). Black feminism reimagined: After intersectionality. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 4(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/7924
- Christou, A. (2024). ‘Insurgent feminisms: women writing wars: mapping gendered trauma, un/learning generative utopias and the intersectional imperative.’ Feminist Review, 137, 132–139.
- Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. Sage.
- Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the Social. Duke University Press.
- Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). ‘Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and vioence against women of color” Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
- Collins, P. H. (2000) Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Unwin Hyman.
- Collins, P. H. (2019) Intersectionality as critical theory. Durham University Press.
- Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized conflict. Sage.
- Çakmak, Y. (2020). İtikattan kimliğe: Dinamikler ve karşı dinamikler bağlamında yetmişli yıllarda aleviler, in (ed.) Kaynar, M. K. Türkiyenin 1970’li Yılları (pp. 645–669). İletişim.
- Çamuroğlu, R. (2008). Değişen koşullarıyla alevilik. Kapı
- Çavdar, O. (2020). Sivas katliamı: Yas ve bellek. İletişim.
- Dinler, V. (2020). ‘Yangın yeri, katliam: Maraş ve çorum, in (ed.) Kaynar, M. K. Türkiyenin 1970’li Yılları (pp. 671–687). İletişim.
- Dressler, M. (2020). Physical and epistemic violence against alevis in modern Turkey, in (eds.) Astourian, S., & Kévorkian, R. Collective and state violence in Turkey: The construction of a national identity from empire to nation-state (pp. 347–71). Berghahn.
- Ellis, J. (2000). Seeing things: Television in the age of uncertainty. I.B. Tauris.
- Emre, K. B. (2023). Media, Religion, Citizenship: Alevi media and its audience. Oxford University Press.
- Emre, K. B. (2018). Communicative ethnocide and Alevi television in the Turkish context, Media, Culture & Society, 40(7), 1008 - 1023.
- Ertan, M. (2017). Aleviliğin politikleşme süreci. İletişim.
- Florini, S. (2019). Beyond hashtags: Racial politics and black digital networks. New York University Press.
- Frosh, P., & Pinchevski, A. (2008). Media Witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication. Springer.
- Gündoğan, N., & Gündoğan, K. (2012). Dersim’in kayıp kızları: Tertele çenequ. İletişim.
- Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective Solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161.
- Hay Way Zaman. (2014). [PAL]. Directed by Nezahat Gündoğan. Miraz Production.
- Issa, T. (2017) Alevis in Europe: Voices of migration, culture and identity. Routledge.
- Two Locks of Hair: The Missing Girls of Dersim. (2010). [PAL]. Directed by Nezahat Gündoğan. Nezahat Gündoğan and Kazım Gündoğan.
- Jongerden, J. (2003). Violation of human rights and the Alevis in Turkey, in (eds.) White, P., & Jongerden, J. Turkey’s alevi enigma: A comprehensive overview (pp. 71–89). Brill.
- Kehl-Bodrogi, K. (2008). The role of Kerbela in the (re-)construction of Alevism in Turkey, in (ed.) Bellér-Hann, I. The Past as Resource in the Turkic Speaking World (pp. 43–57). Ergon.
- Keiser, H. L. (2003). Alevis, Armenians and Kurds in Unionist-Kemalist Turkey (1908–1938), in (eds.) White, P. and Jongerden, J. Turkey’s Alevi enigma: A comprehensive overview (pp.177–196). Brill.
- Madımak Katliamı Hafıza Merkezi. (n.d.) http://madimak.info/ (Accessed: 08 May 2024).
- Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom, Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7-8), 159-181.
- Orhon, G. (2016). Madımak, epizodik imgeler ve popüler bellek, Birikim, July 4. https://birikimdergisi.com/ guncel/7792/madimak-epizodik-imgeler-ve-populer-bellek (Accessed: 24 October 2022).
- Özkan, N. (2019). Representing religious discrimination at the margins: Temporalities and “appropriate” identities of the state in Turkey, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 42(2), 317–331.
- Pedwell, C., & Whitehead, A. (2012). Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory. Feminist Theory 13(2), 115–29.
- Peters, J. D. (2001). Witnessing, Media, Culture & Society, 23(6), 707–723.
- Poyraz, B. (2013). Bellek, hakikat, yüzleşme ve Alevi katliamları, Kültür ve İletişim, 16(1), 9–39.
- Rentschler, C. A. (2004). Witnessing: US citizenship and the vicarious experience of suffering, Media, Culture & Society, 26(2), 296–304.
- Richardson, A.V. (2020). Bearing witness while black: African Americans, smartphones and the new protest #Journalism. Oxford University Press.
- Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Duke University Press.
- Sinclair-Webb, E. (2003). Sectarian violence, the Alevi minority and the left: Kahramanmaraş 1978, in (eds.) White, P., & Jongerden, J. Turkey’s Alevi Enigma: A Comprehensive Overview (pp. 215–236). Brill.
- Shefer, T., & Munt, S. R. (2019). A feminist politics of shame: Shame and its contested possibilities, Feminism & Psychology, 29(2), 145–156.
- Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the pain of others. Penguin.
- Sözen, U. (2019). Culture, Politics and Contested Identity among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: The Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 6(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/196
- Sürgü’de Alevi Kürtlere Ölüm; Allahu Ekber, İstiklal Marşıyla. (2015). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BixzuAn0KC0 (Accessed: 04 December 2023).
- Temel, H. (2021). Alevi hatırlama kültürü: “Canlarımızı yaktınız anmamıza izin vermiyorsunuz”, Birikim, 392, 97–108.
- Vorhoff, K. (1998). Academic and journalistic publications on the Alevi and bektashi of Turkey, in (eds.) Olsson, T., Özdalga, E., & Raudvere, C. Alevi Identity (pp. 23–50). Swedish Research Institute.
- Wahl-Jongersen, K. (2019). Emotions, media and politics. Polity.
- Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press.
- Yalçınkaya, A. (2011). Hafıza savaşlarından sahiplenilmiş şehitliğe: Madımak katliamı örneği, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 66(3), 333–394.
- Zelizer, B. (1998). Remembering to forget: Holocaust memory through the camera's eye. The University of Chicago Press.
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Emre, 2026)
Reference: Emre, K. B. (2026). Decolonial and intersectional approach to media witnessing: Alevi persecutions and political mobilisation through media.
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), Article 8.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17896
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Emre KB. Decolonial and intersectional approach to media witnessing: Alevi persecutions and political mobilisation through media.
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(1), 8.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17896
Chicago
In-text citation: (Emre, 2026)
Reference: Emre, Kumru B.. "Decolonial and intersectional approach to media witnessing: Alevi persecutions and political mobilisation through media".
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 2026 10 no. 1 (2026): 8.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17896
Harvard
In-text citation: (Emre, 2026)
Reference: Emre, K. B. (2026). Decolonial and intersectional approach to media witnessing: Alevi persecutions and political mobilisation through media.
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), 8.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17896
MLA
In-text citation: (Emre, 2026)
Reference: Emre, Kumru B. "Decolonial and intersectional approach to media witnessing: Alevi persecutions and political mobilisation through media".
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, 2026, 8.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17896
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Emre KB. Decolonial and intersectional approach to media witnessing: Alevi persecutions and political mobilisation through media. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(1):8.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17896