Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics
Research Article
2026, 10(1), Article No: 21

From ‘kodrat’ to code: Women ride-hailing drivers redefining Javanese womanhood in the gig economy

Published in Volume 10 Issue 1: 28 Feb 2026
Download: 2
View: 4

Abstract

Digital platforms have reconfigured labor economies in Indonesia, reframing intersections between technological affordances and established gender constructs that have historically circumscribed women’s spatial mobility and economic agency. Contemporary scholarship on technological embodiment offers limited analytical depth of technological integration within cultural contexts where gendered boundaries remain a highly contentious issue. This paper examines how women ride-hailing drivers in Surabaya negotiate and redefine Javanese womanhood through digital platform labor, proposing technological embodiment as cultural negotiation rather than technological adoption – a framework that questions prevailing Western theoretical perspectives. We further point out how women contest economic imperatives through technological appropriations, collective resistance strategies, and identity reformulations that subsequently problematize familial and communal gender dynamics. We extend embodiment theory by interrogating technological integration into gendered corporeality in non-Western contexts; disrupt binary frameworks positioning technology in opposition to tradition; and introduce a critical approach to gender reconstruction as movement from ‘kodrat’ (natural destiny) to code (technological self-determination). This theoretical reframing fundamentally ruptures conventional understandings of how digital technologies both preserve and reconfigure gender relations across contrasting cultural formations.
  • Acar, E., Yigit, F., & Deiri, Y. (2025). A focused review of artificial intelligence in education: Evolution and challenges. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence and Society, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.20897/ jirais/17640
  • Altenried, M. (2020). The platform as factory: Crowdwork and the hidden labour behind artificial intelligence. Capital & Class, 44(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816819899410
  • Attoh, K., Wells, K., & Cullen, D. (2019). “We’re building their data”: Labor, alienation, and idiocy in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(6), 1007–1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0263775819856626
  • Blackburn, S. (2004). Women and the state in modern Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bray, F. (2007). Gender and technology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094328
  • Brenner, S. A. (1998). The domestication of desire: Women, wealth, and modernity in Java. Princeton University Press.
  • Bucher, E., Fieseler, C., & Lutz, C. (2021). What’s mine is yours (for a nominal fee)–Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.002
  • Cameron, L. D. (2020). “Making out” while driving: Relational and efficiency games in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1547
  • Cameron, L. D., & Rahman, H. (2022). Expanding the locus of resistance: Understanding the co-constitution of control and resistance in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.2021.1557
  • Chen, J. Y. (2018). Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2691–2711. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444817729149
  • Christie, N., & Ward, H. (2019). The health and safety risks for people who drive for work in the gig economy. Journal of Transport & Health, 13, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.007
  • Churchill, B., & Craig, L. (2019). Gender in the gig economy: Men and women using digital platforms to secure work in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 55(4), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783319894060
  • Čičigoj, K., Majsova, N., & Šepetavc, J. (2025). Peripheral visions of alternative futures: Feminist techno-imaginaries. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(2), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16778
  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
  • Ferrari, F., & Graham, M. (2021). Fissures in algorithmic power: Platforms, code, and contestation. Cultural Studies, 35(4-5), 814–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.1895250
  • Ford, M., & Honan, V. (2017). The go-jek effect. In E. Jurriëns & R. Tapsell (Eds.), Digital Indonesia: Connectivity and divergence (pp. 275–288). ISEAS Publishing.
  • Ford, M., & Honan, V. (2019). The limits of mutual aid: Emerging forms of collectivity among app-based transport workers in Indonesia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619839428
  • Giorgi, A. (2020). Reflections on certain qualitative and phenomenological psychological methods. University Professors Press.
  • Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
  • Grimalt-Álvaro, C., Valls, C., Cebrián, G. and Marqués-Molías, L. (2025). An exploration of students’ attitudes towards STEM and climate change: A cluster analysis study with a gender perspective. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 02. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/16206
  • Happel-Parkins, A., Azim, K., Neal, M., Barnes, K., & Gnanadass, E. (2024). Stories from the “Pressure Cooker”: U.S. women navigating motherhood and work during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/14390
  • Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.
  • Hayles, N. K. (2000). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (2013). Flesh and metal: Reconfiguring the mindbody in virtual environments. In R. Mitchell & P. Thurtle (Eds.), Data made flesh (pp. 229–248). Routledge.
  • Heiland, H. (2021). Controlling space, controlling labour? Contested space in food delivery gig work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 36(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12183
  • Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.
  • Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Irawan, M. Z., Rizki, M., Joewono, T. B., & Belgiawan, P. F. (2020). Exploring the intention of out-of-home activities participation during new normal conditions in Indonesian cities. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 8, Article 100237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100237
  • James, A. (2024). Platform work-lives in the gig economy: Recentering work–family research. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(2), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13087
  • Kanagasabai, N., & Phadke, S. (2023). Forging fraught solidarities: Friendship and feminist activism in South Asia. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 7(1), Article 02. https://doi.org/ 10.20897/femenc/12880
  • Kusno, A. (2023). Middling urbanism: The megacity and the kampung. In Changing Asian urban geographies (pp. 51–67). Routledge.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.
  • Milkman, R., Elliott-Negri, L., Griesbach, K., & Reich, A. (2021). Gender, class, and the gig economy: The case of platform-based food delivery. Critical Sociology, 47(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520949631
  • Nardoni, M. (2025). Archiving labour reconceptualisations: ‘Scaling up’ with technological means. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(2), Article 23. https://doi.org/ 10.20897/femenc/16781
  • Nastiti, A. D. (2017). Worker unrest and contentious labor practice of ride-hailing services in Indonesia. Arryman Symposium, 13. https://www.edgs.northwestern.edu/documents/2017-nastiti---arryman-paper%2C-evanston-symposium%2C-may-13.pdf
  • Ong, A. (2010). Spirits of resistance and capitalist discipline: Factory women in Malaysia (2nd ed.). State University of New York Press.
  • Qadri, R. (2020). Algorithmized but not atomized? How digital platforms engender new forms of worker solidarity in Jakarta. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 144–144). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375816
  • Raval, N., & Dourish, P. (2016). Standing out from the crowd: Emotional labor, body labor, and temporal labor in ridesharing. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820026
  • Richardson, I., & Harper, C. (2002). Corporeal virtuality: The impossibility of a fleshless ontology. Virtual/ Informational/ Digital. https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/ Corporeal-virtuality-The-impossibility-of-a/991005542641707891/filesAndLinks?index=0
  • Richardson, L. (2020). Coordinating the city: Platforms as flexible spatial arrangements. Urban Geography, 41(3), 458–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1717027
  • Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. University of California Press.
  • Schefers, S. E. (2026). Exploring intersectionality in identity research in multicultural education: Reflecting on the past to forge a more equitable future. Asia Pacific Journal of Education and Society, 14(1), 3. https://doi.org/ 10.20897/apjes/17906
  • Shapiro, A. (2020). Dynamic exploits: Calculative asymmetries in the on-demand economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12160
  • Sinha Roy, M. (2018). Bodies, boundaries and genealogies of connection: Locating networks of feminism(s) in India/South Asia. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 2(1), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc.201802
  • van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1369118X.2017.1294194
  • Veen, A., Barratt, T., & Goods, C. (2020). Platform-capital’s ‘app-etite’ for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0950017019836911
  • Verbeek, P. P. (2015). Designing the public sphere: Information technologies and the politics of mediation. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era (pp. 217–227). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_21
  • Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben057
  • Webb, R. (2026). Post pandemic English language teacher development: A global perspective. European Journal of Education & Language Review, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/17719
  • Wells, K. J., Attoh, K., & Cullen, D. (2021). “Just-in-place” labor: Driver organizing in the uber workplace. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(2), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20949266
  • Wessalowski, n., Lange, G. M., & Kannengießer, S. (2025). A feminist critique of cybersecurity: Technofeminist imaginaries of vulnerability and care. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(2), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16783
  • Wood, A. J., Martindale, N., & Burchell, B. J. (2025). Beyond the ‘gig economy’: Quality of work and flexibility in platform and non-platform self-employment. Work, Employment and Society, 39(5), 1154–1178. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/09500170251336947
  • Zandi-Navgran, L., Berry, J. W., & Afrasiabi, H. (2026). Intercultural relations and stereotypes among Afghan immigrants in Iran: A qualitative study. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 13(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/ 10.29333/ejecs/2370
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Astuti et al., 2026)
Reference: Astuti, R., Suharidadi, F., & Setijaningrum, E. (2026). From ‘kodrat’ to code: Women ride-hailing drivers redefining Javanese womanhood in the gig economy. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17996
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Astuti R, Suharidadi F, Setijaningrum E. From ‘kodrat’ to code: Women ride-hailing drivers redefining Javanese womanhood in the gig economy. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17996
Chicago
In-text citation: (Astuti et al., 2026)
Reference: Astuti, Reni, Fendy Suharidadi, and Erna Setijaningrum. "From ‘kodrat’ to code: Women ride-hailing drivers redefining Javanese womanhood in the gig economy". Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 2026 10 no. 1 (2026): 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17996
Harvard
In-text citation: (Astuti et al., 2026)
Reference: Astuti, R., Suharidadi, F., and Setijaningrum, E. (2026). From ‘kodrat’ to code: Women ride-hailing drivers redefining Javanese womanhood in the gig economy. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17996
MLA
In-text citation: (Astuti et al., 2026)
Reference: Astuti, Reni et al. "From ‘kodrat’ to code: Women ride-hailing drivers redefining Javanese womanhood in the gig economy". Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, 2026, 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17996
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Astuti R, Suharidadi F, Setijaningrum E. From ‘kodrat’ to code: Women ride-hailing drivers redefining Javanese womanhood in the gig economy. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(1):21. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17996
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Submit My Manuscript



Phone: +31 (0)70 2190600 | E-Mail: info@lectitojournals.com

Address: Cultura Building (3rd Floor) Wassenaarseweg 20 2596CH The Hague THE NETHERLANDS

Disclaimer

This site is protected by copyright law. This site is destined for the personal or internal use of our clients and business associates, whereby it is not permitted to copy the site in any other way than by downloading it and looking at it on a single computer, and/or by printing a single hard-copy. Without previous written permission from Lectito BV, this site may not be copied, passed on, or made available on a network in any other manner.

Content Alert

Copyright © 2015-2026 LEUKOS BV All rights reserved.