Abstract
Bureaucratic reform in Indonesia positions the merit system as a key mechanism for strengthening professionalism, fairness, and performance in civil service management. However, implementation at the local level remains uneven because formal rules interact with leadership practices, employee understanding, digital capacity, organizational culture, and political dynamics. This study examines the determinants of merit system implementation and its mediating role in the relationship between organizational-political factors and employee performance in the Pekanbaru City Government. Drawing on institutional theory, the merit system is conceptualized as a governance mechanism that translates formal rules into personnel practices. A quantitative explanatory design was used with survey data from 100 civil servants selected through proportional random sampling. The data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares. The findings show that leadership, employee understanding, and political factors significantly influence merit system implementation, whereas information and communication technology and organizational culture do not. Merit system implementation significantly improves employee performance and mediates the effects of leadership, employee understanding, and political factors. Leadership has a negative direct effect on employee performance, suggesting that formal authority may not improve performance unless it is aligned with meritocratic procedures. Political factors have a positive effect when interpreted as reform support rather than patronage. The study contributes to public administration literature by showing that merit-based governance operates as an institutional bridge between organizational conditions and bureaucratic performance.
- Acar, E., Deiri, Y., & Yigit, F. (2025). A focused review of artificial intelligence in education: Evolution and challenges. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence and Society, 1(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/ 10.20897/jirais/17640
- Becker, G. S. (2002). Human capital. In D. R. Henderson (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of economics (2nd ed.). Liberty Fund.
- Berman, E. M., Prasojo, E., Fathurrahman, R., Samartini, A., Plimmer, G., Sabharwal, M., Neiva, V., Syarien, M. I. A., Hariyati, D., Puspasari, D., Wijayanti, F. W., & Ferdiansyah, J. (2025). Strategic program management: Performance accountability driving use in national governments. Public Administration Review, 85(3), 862–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13892
- Boselie, P., Van Harten, J., & Veld, M. (2021). A human resource management review on public management and public administration research: Stop right there… before we go any further…. Public Management Review, 23(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1695880
- Brewer, G. A., Kellough, J. E., & Rainey, H. G. (2022). The importance of merit principles for civil service systems: Evidence from the U.S. federal sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(4), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X211026008
- Chudnovsky, M., & Castaneda Farill, C. E. (2024). Gender discrimination and merit-based selection: A case study of Mexico. Public Administration and Development, 44(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2041
- Clemons, A. (2025). Supporting faculty resilience: Department chairs' role in community building amid trauma. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15877
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Cooper, C. A., & Reggie, J. (2025). Public sector employees' political activity across administrative traditions: Tensions between democratic participation and bureaucratic impartiality in an era of populism and democratic backsliding. Public Administration Quarterly, 49, 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 07349149241310404
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Dalgalıdere, S. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in crisis journalism: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Gemini news texts. ISophos: International Journal of Information, Technology and Philosophy, 8(15), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.20897/isophos/18446
- Daniarsyah, D. (2017). Implementation of the merit system in open recruitment for promotion of senior civil servant leadership positions: A critical thinking analysis. Civil Service Journal, 11(2), 39–48.
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2095101
- Dogutas, A. (2025). A comparative analysis of immigrant children's educational policies: Türkiye and the United States. European Journal of Education & Language Review, 1(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/17313
- Dwiputrianti, S., Lestari, E. W. T., Sutiyono, W., & Purba, C. O. (2023). Critical success factors merit implementation of civil service management in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Administrative Science (ICAS 2022) (pp. 112–120). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-104-3_12
- Gatiningsih, & Saputra, R. (2026). Population and civil registration as the spearhead of inclusive and effective domestic governance. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 13(3), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.66815/ ejecs/2974
- Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2017 Concerning Civil Servant Management. (2017).
- Griffin, G., & Vehvilainen, M. (2021). The persistence of gender struggles in Nordic research and innovation. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 5(2), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.20897/ femenc/11165
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
- Hartanto, D., Agussani, A., & Dalle, J. (2021). Antecedents of public trust in government during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: Mediation of perceived religious values. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(4), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/975
- Johnson, T., & Lewis, G. B. (2020). Inspecting the merit system's "pivotal idea": Does competitive examination increase the qualifications and quality of the U.S. federal service? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18794808
- Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
- Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2014 Concerning the State Civil Apparatus. (2014).
- Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
- Meyer-Sahling, J. H., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2016). Civil service laws, merit, politicization, and corruption: The perspective of public officials from five East European countries. Public Administration, 94(4), 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12276
- Niko, N., Widianingsih, I., Sulaeman, M., & Fedryansyah, M. (2024). Indigenous women's connection to forest: Colonialism, lack of land ownership and livelihood deprivations of Dayak Benawan in Indonesia. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 8(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.20897/ femenc/14233
- Oliveira, E., Abner, G., Lee, S., Suzuki, K., Hur, H., & Perry, J. L. (2024). What does the evidence tell us about merit principles and government performance? Public Administration, 102, 668–690. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/padm.12945
- Omoniyi, T. O. (2026). Relevant, timely, and inclusive? A qualitative appraisal of INEC's voter education programme (VEP) in Ondo City, Nigeria. Asia Pacific Journal of Education and Society, 14(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.20897/apjes/17956
- Park, S., & Jeon, S. H. (2022). Merit principles merit further investigation: The influence on employee perception of whistleblowing. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(12), 894–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01900692.2021.1928185
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
- Riahi, H. (2026). Intersectionality and Islamic feminism: Key tools for eradicating gender inequality in the Saudi labour market. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17997
- Roziqin, A., Kamil, M., Ma'mur, R. M., & Bintang, R. M. (2026). Merit system in Indonesian government: Policy implementation and determinant factors. Public Administration Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07349149251413245
- Sabrina, R., Akrim, A., Hartanto, D., & Dalle, J. (2021). Role of perceived religious values to facilitate predictors of public trust in government: The case of a Muslim-majority culture. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1776
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2017). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
- Shishakly, R. (2025). Understanding AI in higher education: Gendered and intersectional students' experience with ChatGPT use. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), Article 36. https://doi.org/10.20897/ ejsteme/17646
- Suh, J., & Battaglio, P. (2022). Assessing the mediating effect of internal communication on strategic human resource management and perceived performance: An intersectoral comparison. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(3), 464–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X21994185
- Sultan, Y., Dautova, G., & Dalle, J. (2025). Examining the relationship among artificial intelligence literacy, cultural literacy, and intercultural communication proficiency of philology students. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 12(5), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2839
- Sunam, R., Pariyar, B., & Shrestha, K. K. (2022). Does affirmative action undermine meritocracy? "Meritocratic inclusion" of the marginalized in Nepal's bureaucracy. Development Policy Review, 40(1), Article e12554. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12554
- Suzuki, K., & Hur, H. (2022). Revisiting the old debate: Citizens' perceptions of meritocracy in public and private organizations. Public Management Review, 24(8), 1226–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1895545
- Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
- Weber, M. (2009). The theory of social and economic organization. Simon & Schuster.
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Andarwati et al., 2026)
Reference: Andarwati, D., Andri, S., Karneli, O., & Adianto, A. (2026). Merit system implementation and employee performance in Pekanbaru city government.
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(2), Article 5.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18748
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Andarwati D, Andri S, Karneli O, Adianto A. Merit system implementation and employee performance in Pekanbaru city government.
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(2), 5.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18748
Chicago
In-text citation: (Andarwati et al., 2026)
Reference: Andarwati, Desi, Seno Andri, Okta Karneli, and Adianto Adianto. "Merit system implementation and employee performance in Pekanbaru city government".
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 2026 10 no. 2 (2026): 5.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18748
Harvard
In-text citation: (Andarwati et al., 2026)
Reference: Andarwati, D., Andri, S., Karneli, O., and Adianto, A. (2026). Merit system implementation and employee performance in Pekanbaru city government.
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(2), 5.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18748
MLA
In-text citation: (Andarwati et al., 2026)
Reference: Andarwati, Desi et al. "Merit system implementation and employee performance in Pekanbaru city government".
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, 2026, 5.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18748
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Andarwati D, Andri S, Karneli O, Adianto A. Merit system implementation and employee performance in Pekanbaru city government. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(2):5.
https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18748