Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics
Research Article
2026, 10(1), Article No: 23

Technological effects on gender studies: An intersectional perspective

Published in Volume 10 Issue 1: 28 Feb 2026
Download: 211
View: 398

Abstract

This study offers a comprehensive and critical exploration of the intersections between technologization, digitalization, and gender dynamics in contemporary digital culture. Historically, feminist discourses have been rooted in socio-political paradigms; however, the emergence of cyberfeminism and the growing complexity of gendered experiences in digital environments have redefined both the epistemic and practical boundaries of gender studies. Through a systematic literature review of recent, high-impact research, the paper examines whether digital transformation represents a paradigmatic shift in the construction, performance, and contestation of gender identities. The analysis reveals that while digital technologies hold significant emancipatory potential—facilitating anonymity, accessibility, and expanded public participation—they frequently replicate and even intensify patriarchal norms. This occurs through mechanisms such as cyberviolence, algorithmic bias, digital exclusion, and the ongoing underrepresentation of women in STEM fields. The findings underscore those digital spaces are not ideologically neutral or inherently egalitarian; rather, they operate as contested terrains where power relations are renegotiated and embodied in novel forms. Furthermore, the review highlights geographic and disciplinary disparities in scholarly focus, as well as thematic patterns linking digital culture to structural disadvantages faced by women and marginalized gender identities. By integrating insights from sociology, feminist theory, communication studies, health informatics, and STEM education, the article argues for the urgent development of intersectional, gender-sensitive policies, as well as multi-stakeholder collaborations. Such frameworks are essential to resist the re-inscription of masculine dominance and to promote the emergence of inclusive, equitable technological ecosystems that foster genuine gender equality.
Figure 1 Figure 1. Distribution of research focus areas
  • Acar, E., Yigit, F., & Deiri, Y. (2025). A focused review of artificial intelligence in education: Evolution and challenges. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence and Society, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.20897/jirais/17640
  • Achtzehn, S., Treanor, L., & Amess, K. (2023). Do enterprise education competitions have gendered outcomes amongst STEM early-career researchers? International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 41(8), 801-824. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426231158281
  • Addison, M., Ohene‑Yankyera, K., Adjei, P. W., Mujawamariya, G., & Asante, B. (2023). Uptake and income distribution effects of targeted farm technologies on rice farmers in forest and Guinea Savannah zones of Ghana: Does gender matter? Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 11, Article 100516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100516
  • Amirtham S, N., & Kumar, A. (2023). The underrepresentation of women in STEM disciplines in India: a secondary analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 45(12), 1008–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09500693.2023.2179901
  • Aydemir, D. (2021). Siberfeminizm. Urzeni Yayınevi.
  • Aydemir, D. (2022). Büyük Veri’nin cinsiyet veri boşluğu. Tarih Bilinci: Tarih ve Kültür Dergisi, 42, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.29228/kesit.63123
  • Bacaicoa, J. M., Fernández, M. A., Wachs, S., & Guadix, M. G. (2023). Prevalence and motivations for technology-facilitated gender- and sexuality-based violence among adults: A mixed-methods study. Sex Roles, 89(7–8), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01373-7
  • Banton, C., Garza, J. A., & Jones, T. (2026). Exploring gender dynamics and diversity in the technology industry: A qualitative examination of women’s experiences. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(1), 332-349. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17875
  • Birkett, G. (2023). Gendering the carceral web: Public sector reform, technology and digital (in)justice. Theoretical Criminology, 27(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221131855
  • Chen, S., Doerr, S., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., & Shin, H. S. (2023). The fintech gender gap. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 55, 101006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2023.101006
  • Čičigoj, K., Majsova, N., & Šepetavc, M. (2025). Peripheral visions of alternative futures: Feminist techno-imaginaries. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(2), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16778
  • Cookson, T. P., Fuentes, L., Zulver, J. M., & Nelson, A. (2023). Fit for purpose? Assessing the accessibility, theory of action, and accountability of digital technology interventions for sexual and gender-based violence prevention and response. Gender, Technology and Development, 27(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09718524.2023.2195125
  • Council of Europe. (2015). Gender equality glossary. Gender Equality Commission.
  • Crăiuț, M. V., & Iancu, I. (2022). Is technology gender neutral? A systematic literature review on gender stereotypes attached to artificial intelligence. Human Technology, 18(3), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.17011/ ht/urn.202212195035
  • Deiri, Y., & Burkhard, T. (2025). The "then" and "now" politics of fear: A multilingual intimate duo-ethnography at the crossroads of language, religion, immigration, and education. European Journal of Education & Language Review, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/17648
  • Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., & Palladino, R. (2022). Blockchain technology and gender equality: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102432. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijinfomgt.2021.102432
  • Fikejzová, L., & Charvát, J. (2025). Fully electrified kitchen is all that a modern emancipated woman needs: The feminist techno-utopia in the ınterwar czechoslovak women’s magazine eva. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(2), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16779
  • Filippi, E., Banno, M., & Trento, S. (2023). Automation technologies and the risk of substitution of women: Can gender equality reduce the gap? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 191, 122553. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.techfore.2023.122553
  • Foster, M. (2010). Sporting the invisible technologist: The intermediate technology development group. Gender and Development, 18(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552071003600048
  • Gajjala, R., & Mamidipudi, A. (1999). Cyberfeminism, technology and international development. Gender and Development, 7(2), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/741922954
  • Granato, S. (2023). Early influences and the choice of college major: Can policies reduce the gender gap in scientific curricula (STEM)? Journal of Policy Modelling, 45(3), 652–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.02.006
  • Hencke, J., Eck, M., Sass, J., Hastedt, D., & Mejia-Rodriguez, A. (2022). Missing out on half of the world’s potential: Fewer female than male top achievers in mathematics and science want a career in these fields (IEA Compass: Briefs in Education No. 17). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
  • Hokka, J. (2023). Gender and the diversity of the human body as challenges for the inclusive design of wearable technology. Fashion Practice: The Journal of Design, Creative Process & the Fashion Industry, 15(3), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2023.2243295
  • Işıklı, Ş. (2017). Web 2.0, dişil usu yeniden inşa edebilir mi? AJIT-E: Academic Journal of Information Technology, 8(29), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.5824/1309-1581.2017.4.003.x
  • Işıklı, Ş. (2025). Kadın ve Felsefe. 2’nd Edition. Egitim Publication.
  • Işıklı, Ş., & Ercan, S. (2020). Dijital çağın ruhsal danışmanları: Çevrimiçi manevi danışmanlık uygulamaları. İskenderiye Publication.
  • Işıklı, Ş., & Küçükvardar, M. (2025). Bilişim devrimi: Teknolojinin felsefi ve sosyolojik analizi. 2’nd Edition. Kedidedi Publication.
  • Işıklı. (2014). Kadına tahakküm ya da eril usun tavırları. Akademik Bakış: Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 43(May-June), 1-18. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/382827
  • Katz, N. (2026). Digital inequality in context: A socio-technical analysis of Arab students’ remote learning in Israel. Asia Pacific Journal of Education and Society, 14(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.20897/apjes/17975
  • Kim, S., Choi, E., & Champion, J. D. (2023). Technology-facilitated sexual violence in South Korea: A content analysis of a website for victims. Violence Against Women, 29(3–4), 468–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 10778012221135355
  • Kusuma, P. I. (2023). The role of gender in student teachers’ technology integration in teaching English speaking skills during the COVID-19 pandemic. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 15(3), 487–505. https://doi.org/ 10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.023
  • Martínez, M., Segura, F., Andújar, J. M., & Ceada, Y. (2023). The gender gap in STEM careers: An inter-regional and transgenerational experimental study to identify the low presence of women. Education Sciences, 13(7), 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070687
  • Matthias, K., Honekamp, I., Heinrich, M., & De Santis, K. K. (2023). Consideration of sex, gender, or age on outcomes of digital technologies for treatment and monitoring of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Overview of systematic reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e45274. https://doi.org/10.2196/45274
  • McCall, T., Foster, M., & Schwartz, T. (2023). Attitudes toward seeking mental health services and mobile technology to support the management of depression among Black American women: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e46955. https://doi.org/10.2196/46955
  • Niño-Cortés, L. M., Grimalt-Álvaro, C., Lores-Gómez, B., & Usart, M. (2023). The digital gender gap in secondary school: Differences in self-perceived competence and attitude towards technology. Educación XX1, 26(2), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.31745
  • Özkan, N. (2023). “Sensing” productivity at home: Self-tracking technologies, gender, and labor in Turkey. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(5), zmad022. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad022
  • Powell, A., & Flynn, A. (2023). Technology-facilitated abuse victimization: A gendered analysis in a representative survey of adults. Feminist Criminology, 18(3), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851221126342
  • Reyes, C., & Neergaard, H. (2023). Feminist perspectives on gender and technology entrepreneurship in incubator settings. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 64–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-02-2022-0027
  • Ribeirinha, T., Baptista, M. and Correia, M. (2024). The impact of STEM activities on the interest and aspirations in STEM careers of 12th-grade Portuguese students in science and technology curriculum. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/15830
  • Ryakitimbo, R. (2022). Does technology have a gender? https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/blog/does-technology-have-a-gender/
  • Sebastián-Tirado, A., Félix-Esbrí, S., Forn, C., & Sanchis-Segura, C. (2023). Are gender–science stereotypes barriers for women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Exploring when, how, and to whom in an experimentally-controlled setting. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1219012. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2023.1219012
  • Tatman, R. (2017). Gender and dialect bias in YouTube’s automatic captions. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing (pp. 53–59). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-1606
  • UNESCO. (2024). Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). https://www.unesco.org/en/gender-equality/education/stem
  • Verdugo, G., Echeverría, J., Villarroel, A., & Fuenzalida, M. (2023). Influence of students’ personality, gender, income, and age on their intentions to create new information technology and telecommunications ventures. PLOS ONE, 18(7), e0287659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287659
  • Wajcman, J. (2006). The Feminization of Work in the Information Age. In M. F. F. Fox, D. G. Johnson, & S. V. Rosser (Eds.), Women, Gender, and Technology (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 80–97). University of Illinois Press.
  • Warren, A., & Gibson, C. (2023). Struggles over skills: Lived experiences of evolving technologies and gendered hierarchies at work. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(3), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 24694452.2022.2126079
  • Washington, DC. Zhang, X., Wang, Y., & Leung, S. (2023). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and sports bracelets usage in physical education for freshmen: The role of gender and self-efficacy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2154320
  • wessalowski, N., Lange, G. M., & Kannengießer, S. (2025). A feminist critique of cybersecurity: Technofeminist imaginaries of vulnerability and care. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(2), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16783
  • Widder, D. G. (2017). Gender and robots: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Gender, Technology and AI (pp. 1–15). https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04716
  • Yang, P., & Henderson, S. (2024). Race, gender, class, and perceived everyday discrimination. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(3), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1801
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Işıklı & Fazlıoğlu, 2026)
Reference: Işıklı, Ş., & Fazlıoğlu, E. F. (2026). Technological effects on gender studies: An intersectional perspective. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17998
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Işıklı Ş, Fazlıoğlu EF. Technological effects on gender studies: An intersectional perspective. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17998
Chicago
In-text citation: (Işıklı and Fazlıoğlu, 2026)
Reference: Işıklı, Şevki, and Esra Fatma Fazlıoğlu. "Technological effects on gender studies: An intersectional perspective". Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 2026 10 no. 1 (2026): 23. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17998
Harvard
In-text citation: (Işıklı and Fazlıoğlu, 2026)
Reference: Işıklı, Ş., and Fazlıoğlu, E. F. (2026). Technological effects on gender studies: An intersectional perspective. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17998
MLA
In-text citation: (Işıklı and Fazlıoğlu, 2026)
Reference: Işıklı, Şevki et al. "Technological effects on gender studies: An intersectional perspective". Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, 2026, 23. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17998
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Işıklı Ş, Fazlıoğlu EF. Technological effects on gender studies: An intersectional perspective. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(1):23. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17998
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Submit My Manuscript



Phone: +31 (0)70 2190600 | E-Mail: info@lectitojournals.com

Address: Cultura Building (3rd Floor) Wassenaarseweg 20 2596CH The Hague THE NETHERLANDS

Disclaimer

This site is protected by copyright law. This site is destined for the personal or internal use of our clients and business associates, whereby it is not permitted to copy the site in any other way than by downloading it and looking at it on a single computer, and/or by printing a single hard-copy. Without previous written permission from Lectito BV, this site may not be copied, passed on, or made available on a network in any other manner.

Content Alert

Copyright © 2015-2026 LEUKOS BV All rights reserved.