Download: 32
View: 95

Abstract

In this collection of five short essays, each authors examine how online spaces produce and reproduce queer marginalisation while also offering opportunities for queer expression, connection, and resistance. Tanvi Kanchan examines Indian queer activists’ connections with Indigenous and Black politics in the U.S. and anti-gender rhetoric that travels between American conservative contexts and Indian Hindutva contexts to highlight how digitally mediated transnational rhetoric is simultaneously progressive and reactionary. Łukasz Szulc, on the other hand, proposes that feminist and queer manifestos can suggest ways to imagine alternative digital futures and navigate the present. Likewise, Yener Bayramoğlu unearths the ambivalence emerging from digital spaces offering connection, visibility, and resistance while also extracting data and regulating subjects. Ahmet Atay considers how the digital mundane presents an opportunity for queer disruption and activism, and, finally, Rohit Dasgupta encourages the tension of concurrent embodiment in digital and offline spaces. From these essays, we see rising tensions between digitally mediated 'transnational' and the local struggles, and queer critical imaginaries and organisational work. Here, we find space for queer presence and activism within both mediated and unmediated public spaces.
  • Andrews, K. (2019). Stained glass windows and rainbows: My journey to socially just perceptions of and actions toward LGBTQ students. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/6436
  • Atuk, S., & Cole, A. (2024). Bodies on the line vs. bodies online: A feminist phenomenology of digitally mediated political action. Women’s Studies in Communication, 47(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409. 2023.2297288
  • Ahmed, R., & Huq, E. (2024). Between queer joy and injury: The making and unmaking of a queer sanctuary, Nanur Basha, in Bangladesh. GLQ, 30(4), 369-389. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-11331130.
  • Altay, T. (2022). The pink line across digital publics: Political homophobia and the queer strategies of everyday life during COVID-19 in Turkey. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 29(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 13505068221076329
  • Atay, A. (2021). Digital transnational queer isolations and connections. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 14(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2021.1939404
  • Baishya, A. K., Mini, D. S., & Soundararajan, T. (2023). The anti-caste alter-network: Equality labs and anti-caste activism in the US, Communication, Culture and Critique, 16(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcad011
  • Banaji, S. (2023). ‘Activists’ contra democracy: the dangers of rightwing activism and its strategic disavowal, Communication, Culture and Critique, 16(2), 116-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcad014
  • Banerjea, N., Boyce, P., & Dasgupta, R.K. (2022) (eds). COVID-19 Assemblages: Queer and feminist ethnographies from South Asia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003262251.
  • Benjamin, R. (2019). Captivating technology: Race, carceral technoscience, and liberatory imagination in everyday life. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478004493.
  • Biswas, S., Dasgupta, R.K., & Mahn, C. (2023). Queer politics in times of new authoritarianisms. South Asian Popular Culture, 21(2), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2023.2232181.
  • Bivens, R. (2017). The gender binary will not be deprogrammed: Ten years of coding gender on Facebook. New Media & Society, 19(6), 880-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621527.
  • Borisa, D. (2020). Hopeful rantings of a dalit-queer person. Jindal Law and Humanities Review, 1(1), 91-95.
  • Bould, M. (2020). Our Frightful hobgoblin, or, notes towards full-on fully automated luxury green diffabled trans* feminist queer inter-species space communism of color. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 31(1), 29-167.
  • Cabadağ, N., & Ediger, G. (2020). We disperse to Berlin: transnational entanglements of LGBTI+ movements in Turkey. In M. Castro Varela and B. Ülker (eds), Doing Tolerance. Urban Interventions and Forms of Participation (pp.194-210). Opladen, Germany: Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10h9f87.13
  • de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, trans). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  • Chamas, S. (2026). The devil’s in decline: Western anti-gender politics and the evolution of queerphobia in Lebanon, Signs, forthcoming.
  • Cuboniks, L. (2018). The xenofeminist manifesto:a politics for alienation. Verso
  • Das, C., & Tripathi, P. (2025). (En)Queering ‘Prakriti’: Decolonial ecofeminism and lesbian subjectivity in Out! Stories from the new queer India. Feminist Encounters, 9(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16789
  • Dasgupta, R. K. (2017). Digital queer cultures in India. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207032.
  • Eckert, S., & Steiner, L. (2025). Introduction: the herstory of the (feminist) manifesto, in S. Eckert and L. Steiner (eds), We can do better: Feminist manifestos for media and communication, (pp. 1-12). Rutgers University Press. https://doi.org/10.36019/9781978838208-001.
  • Elsesser, K. (2023). Elon Musk deems ‘cis’ a Twitter slur–here’s why it’s is so polarizing, Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2023/07/02/elon-musk-deems-cis-a-twitter-slurheres-why-its-is-so-polarizing/
  • Gajjala, R. (2003). South Asian digital diasporas and cyberfeminist webs: Negotiating globalization, nation, gender and information technology design. Contemporary South Asia, 12(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0958493032000123362
  • Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets on the streets. Pluto. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183pdzs.
  • Godhe, M., & Goode, L. (2018). Beyond capitalist realism – why we need critical future studies. Culture Unbound, 10(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1790615.
  • Gosset, R., Stanley, E. A., & Burton, J. (2022). Trap door: Trans cultural production and the politics of visibility. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/critiquedart.29151.
  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Relation between science, religion and common sense. Quentin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (eds and trans) The Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, (pp. 630-656). London, UK: Lawrence & Wishart.
  • Gramsci, A. (2000). The philosophy of praxis and 'intellectual and moral reformation.’ David Forgacs (comp.), A Gramsci Reader, First Edition, (pp. 350-353). New York University Press.
  • Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, and P. Willis (eds), Culture, Media, Language: Working papers in cultural studies (pp. 63-87). Hutchinson.
  • Haritaworn, J. (2024) ‘Middle east conflict in Berlin schools’: On affectability of ‘fake news.’ Communication, Culture and Critique, 17(3), 217-220. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcae022
  • Haraway, D. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review.
  • Hester, H. (2018). Xenofeminism. Polity.
  • Holvikivi, A., Holzberg, B., and Ojeda, T. (2024) (Eds). Transnational anti-gender politics: Feminist solidarity in times of global attacks. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
  • Kahraman, S., Şener, Özlem, & Kaytaz, E. F. (2023). The relationship between emotional expression, life satisfaction, and psychological resilience in gay men in Turkey. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(4), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1655
  • Kanchan, T. (2024). ‘Instagram is like a karela’: Transnational digital queer politics and online censorship and surveillance in India. Communication, Culture and Critique, 17(3), 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcae034
  • Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as Method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Minj, N. S., & Pandit, N. (2024). Anti-gender and anti-feminist politics in India: Notes on fascism, feminist solidarity and liberatory politics. In A. Holvikivi, B. Holzberg and T. Ojeda (eds) Transnational Anti-gender Politics: Feminist solidarity in times of global attacks (pp. 119-140). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mitra, R., & Gajjala, R. (2010). Networked agency and building community: Encountering queer ‘desi’ blogging through dialogue. In M. B. Hinner (ed), The Interrelationship of Business and Communication: A forum for general and intercultural business communication, vol. 6, (pp. 383-407). Peter Lang.
  • Muñoz, J. E. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of color and the performance of politics. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Muñoz, J. E. (2009[2019]). Cruising utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. 10th Anniversary Edition. NYU Press.
  • Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001.
  • Ong, J. C. (2017). Queer cosmopolitanism in the disaster zone: ‘My Grindr became the United Nations.’ International Communication Gazette, 79(6-7), 656-673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048517727177
  • Paasonen, S. (2020). Resonant networks: An affect and social media. In A. Fleig and C. von Scheve (eds) Public Spheres of Resonance: Constellations of affect and language (pp. 49-62). Routledge.
  • Paliwal, A. (2022). Why minorities are abandoning India’s trailblazing queer forums. Rest of World, https://restofworld.org/2022/india-lgbtqi-forums/
  • Powers, D. (2020). Towards a futurist cultural studies. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(4), 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920913569.
  • Preciado, P. B. (2018). Countersexual manifesto. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/prec17562.
  • Puar, J. K. (2012). ‘I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess’: Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory. philoSOPHIA, 2(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/phi.2012.a486621.
  • Rao, R. (2020). Out of time: The queer politics of postcoloniality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190865511.001.0001.
  • Rédai, D. (2024) ‘Leave our kids alone.’ Child protection, sex education, LGBT+ rights and anti-gender politics in Hungary. In A. Holvikivi, B. Holzberg and T. Ojeda (eds), Transnational Anti-gender Politics: Feminist solidarity in times of global attacks, (pp. 141-160). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54223-7_7.
  • Roy, S. (2003). From Khush list to gay Bombay: Virtual webs of real people. In C. Berry, F. Martin and A. Yue (eds.) Mobile Cultures: New media in Queer Asia, (pp. 180–200). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822384380-009.
  • Russell, L. (2020). Glitch feminism: A manifesto. Verso.
  • Shah, S. (2024). Caste capitalism and queer theory: Beyond identity politics. India, South Atlantic Quarterly, 123(1), 105–12. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-10920750.
  • Syed, T. (2024). Keynote lecture [Conference Session]. Transnational Anti-gender Politics and Resistance Conference, London, UK, https://www.lse.ac.uk/events/politics.
  • Szulc, Ł. (2013, 22 June). Feminist and queer manifestos for digital utopias [Conference Session]. Keynote at the Digital Good Network. https://digitalgood.net/lukasz-szulc-feminist-and-queer-manifestos-for-digital-utopias/
  • Taylor, A. (2016). Against activism, The Baffler, 30, 123-131.
  • Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300228175
  • Yanoshevsky, G. (2009). Three decades of writing on manifesto: The making of a genre. Poetics Today, 30(2), 257-286. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2008-010.
  • Zengin, A. (2024). Violent intimacies: The Trans everyday and the making of an urban world. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.119336.
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Gajjjala et al., 2026)
Reference: Gajjjala, R., Basu, M., Stanfield, K. B., Kanchan, T., Dasgupta, R. K., Sculz, L., Atay, A., & Bayramoglu, Y. (2026). A feminist critique of cybersecurity: Techno feminist imaginaries of vulnerability and care. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17885
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Gajjjala R, Basu M, Stanfield KB, et al. A feminist critique of cybersecurity: Techno feminist imaginaries of vulnerability and care. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17885
Chicago
In-text citation: (Gajjjala et al., 2026)
Reference: Gajjjala, Radhika, Maitrayee Basu, Kelsey Brooke Stanfield, Tanvi Kanchan, Rohit K. Dasgupta, Lukasz Sculz, Ahmet Atay, and Yener Bayramoglu. "A feminist critique of cybersecurity: Techno feminist imaginaries of vulnerability and care". Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 2026 10 no. 1 (2026): 4. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17885
Harvard
In-text citation: (Gajjjala et al., 2026)
Reference: Gajjjala, R., Basu, M., Stanfield, K. B., Kanchan, T., Dasgupta, R. K., Sculz, L., . . . Bayramoglu, Y. (2026). A feminist critique of cybersecurity: Techno feminist imaginaries of vulnerability and care. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17885
MLA
In-text citation: (Gajjjala et al., 2026)
Reference: Gajjjala, Radhika et al. "A feminist critique of cybersecurity: Techno feminist imaginaries of vulnerability and care". Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, 2026, 4. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17885
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Gajjjala R, Basu M, Stanfield KB, Kanchan T, Dasgupta RK, Sculz L, et al. A feminist critique of cybersecurity: Techno feminist imaginaries of vulnerability and care. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2026;10(1):4. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/17885
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Submit My Manuscript



Phone: +31 (0)70 2190600 | E-Mail: info@lectitojournals.com

Address: Cultura Building (3rd Floor) Wassenaarseweg 20 2596CH The Hague THE NETHERLANDS

Disclaimer

This site is protected by copyright law. This site is destined for the personal or internal use of our clients and business associates, whereby it is not permitted to copy the site in any other way than by downloading it and looking at it on a single computer, and/or by printing a single hard-copy. Without previous written permission from Lectito BV, this site may not be copied, passed on, or made available on a network in any other manner.

Content Alert

Copyright © 2015-2026 LEUKOS BV All rights reserved.