Abstract
Deficit-oriented language continues to shape how students with learning difficulties and disabilities are identified, discussed, and taught. This critical narrative review examines how descriptions such as “weak,” “low ability,” and “problematic” construct learner identities and legitimise particular educational responses. It focuses on the operation of deficit discourse across teacher talk, assessment, referral, behavioural policy, and institutional practice, while also examining tensions between diagnostic provision and neurodiversity-affirming critique. An iterative, conceptually guided search of OpenAlex and ERIC covered English-language peer-reviewed literature published from January 2015 to March 2026, supplemented by foundational works in Critical Applied Linguistics, disability studies in education, raciolinguistics, and inclusive education. Sources were selected purposively according to their relevance to the review questions, producing an interpretive corpus of 22 substantive publications; Snyder (2019) was additionally used as a methodological source. The synthesis generated five themes: the individualisation of educational difficulty; labels, expectations, and learner identity; linguistic normativity and intersectional marginalisation; the institutional persistence of medicalised and ableist models; and neurodiversity-informed alternatives. Findings show that deficit discourse can lower expectations, narrow participation, and obscure environmental barriers. However, diagnostic language may also enable recognition and resource access, and neurodiversity perspectives contain unresolved tensions concerning impairment, support needs, and terminology. The review argues for critical language awareness combined with continued access to specialised support, and offers implications for teacher education, assessment, and inclusive school practice.
- Baglieri, S. (2022). Disability studies and the inclusive classroom: Critical practices for embracing diversity in education(3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
- CAST. (2024). Universal design for learning guidelines version 3.0 [Graphic organizer]. CAST.
- Chapman, R. (2021). Neurodiversity and the social ecology of mental functions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1360–1372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620959833
- Cioè-Peña, M. (2021a). (M)othering labeled children: Bilingualism and disability in the lives of Latinx mothers. Multilingual Matters.
- Cioè-Peña, M. (2021b). Raciolinguistics and the education of emergent bilinguals labeled as disabled. The Urban Review, 53(3), 443–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-020-00581-z
- DeThorne, L. S., & Gerlach-Houck, H. (2023). Resisting ableism in school-based speech-language therapy: An invitation to change. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 54(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-22-00139
- Dudley-Marling, C., & Gurn, A. (Eds.). (2010). The myth of the normal curve. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0039-0
- Fairclough, N. (Ed.). (1992). Critical language awareness. Longman.
- Felder, F. (2025). Unveiling ableism in education: A critical examination of its normativity and implications for learning in schools. Educational Theory, 75(5), 848–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.70044
- Flores, N. (2020). From academic language to language architecture: Challenging raciolinguistic ideologies in research and practice. Theory Into Practice, 59(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665411
- Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
- Goodall, G., Mjøen, O. M., Witsø, A. E., Horghagen, S., & Kvam, L. (2024). "Breaking a vicious cycle": The reproduction of ableism in higher education and its impact on students with disabilities. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1504832. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1504832
- Goodley, D. (2024). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction (3rd ed.). SAGE.
- Hobson, H. M., Toseeb, U., & Gibson, J. L. (2024). Developmental language disorder and neurodiversity: Surfacing contradictions, tensions and unanswered questions. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(4), 1505–1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13009
- Inoue, M. (2006). Vicarious language: Gender and linguistic modernity in Japan. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/j.ctt1pnhkn
- Kashikar, L., Soemers, L., Lüke, T., & Grosche, M. (2023). Does the 'learning disability' label lower teachers' performance expectations? Social Psychology of Education, 26(4), 971–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09775-1
- Kashikar, L., Soemers, L., Lüke, T., & Grosche, M. (2024). Influence of the 'learning disability' label on teachers' performance expectations—A matter of attitudes towards inclusion? Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 24(3), 696–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12664
- Lalvani, P., & Osieja, E. (2025). Battle fatigue: Parents, institutionalized ableism, and the "fight" for inclusive education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 50(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969241259365
- Leinfuss, J., & O'Hara, E. (2024). Facilitating inclusion for neurodiverse students using evidence-based practices: A strengths-based approach to sensory regulation. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 17(3), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2024.2349306
- Liasidou, A. (2015). Inclusive education and the issue of change: Theory, policy and pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333704
- Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
- Nieminen, J. H., Reinholz, D. L., & Valero, P. (2024). "Mathematics is a battle, but I've learned to survive": Becoming a disabled student in university mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 116(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10311-x
- Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
- Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Pennycook, A. (2021). Critical applied linguistics: A critical re-introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090571
- Rajotte, E., Grandisson, M., Couture, M. M., Desmarais, C., Chrétien-Vincent, M., Godin, J., & Thomas, N. (2025). A neuroinclusive school model: Focus on the school, not on the child. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 18(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2024.2341643
- Saldaña, J. (2025). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (5th ed.). SAGE.
- Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887456
- Slee, R. (2018). Inclusive education isn't dead, it just smells funny (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429486869
- Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
- Stinson, C., Migliarini, V., & Miller, A. L. (2025). 'We persist in this cycle': A critical disability raciolinguistic analysis of behavioral policies for emergent bilinguals labeled as disabled. The Urban Review, 57(2), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-024-00719-3
- Valencia, R. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203853214
- Wagland, Z., Sterman, J., Scott-Cole, L., Spassiani, N., & Njelesani, J. (2025). Promoting neurodiversity-affirming care for autistic children: A scoping review. Neurodiversity, 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/27546330251357479
- Walker, N. (2021). Neuroqueer heresies: Notes on the neurodiversity paradigm, autistic empowerment, and postnormal possibilities. Autonomous Press.
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Vasileiou, 2026)
Reference: Vasileiou, I. (2026). Constructing ‘weak students’: Deficit discourses and linguistic marginalisation in special education.
European Journal of Education & Language Review, 2(2), Article 6.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19339
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Vasileiou I. Constructing ‘weak students’: Deficit discourses and linguistic marginalisation in special education.
European Journal of Education & Language Review. 2026;2(2), 6.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19339
Chicago
In-text citation: (Vasileiou, 2026)
Reference: Vasileiou, Ilias. "Constructing ‘weak students’: Deficit discourses and linguistic marginalisation in special education".
European Journal of Education & Language Review 2026 2 no. 2 (2026): 6.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19339
Harvard
In-text citation: (Vasileiou, 2026)
Reference: Vasileiou, I. (2026). Constructing ‘weak students’: Deficit discourses and linguistic marginalisation in special education.
European Journal of Education & Language Review, 2(2), 6.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19339
MLA
In-text citation: (Vasileiou, 2026)
Reference: Vasileiou, Ilias "Constructing ‘weak students’: Deficit discourses and linguistic marginalisation in special education".
European Journal of Education & Language Review, vol. 2, no. 2, 2026, 6.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19339
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Vasileiou I. Constructing ‘weak students’: Deficit discourses and linguistic marginalisation in special education. European Journal of Education & Language Review. 2026;2(2):6.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19339