Abstract
This research investigates the application of ideational grammatical metaphor (IGM) and transitivity patterns within Trump’s speeches, addresses, and interviews, spanning from his 2025 inaugural address to June 2025, utilizing Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) framework. This study inspects how Trump employs grammatical metaphor (GM), specifically nominalization, and manipulates transitivity processes to shape political narratives, establish authority and power dynamics, obscure agency, and communicate ideological stances. The analysis reveals that Trump’s communication style is marked by a prevalence of material processes, highlighting action and agency, a strategic use of GM to reify abstract concepts, and consistent transitivity patterns that support his political objectives. Through a descriptive-analytical examination of a 95,609‑word corpus comprising nine speech contexts, the study combines frequency‑based analysis with detailed clause‑level interpretation. It shows that Trump systematically deploys material processes to construe himself and his administration as highly agentive actors, relational processes to fix identities and values as seemingly factual, and nominalization to reify complex political processes into abstract entities that can be claimed, restored, or defended. Taken together, these patterns constitute an “agentic leadership discourse” in which grammatical choices redistribute agency between Trump, allies, and opponents and stabilize a particular worldview. The study extends earlier SFL‑based analyses of Trump by focusing on his second term, integrating ideational grammatical metaphor with transitivity, and comparing multiple genres (formal addresses, interviews, and press conferences) within a single presidency
- Adjei, A. A., Ewusi-Mensah, L., & Okoh, H. (2015). Transitivity in political discourse: A study of the major process types in the 2009 state-of-the-nation address in Ghana. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 16, 23–32.
- Akmal, S., Zulfikar, T., & Marjan, Z. (2026). Seeing Aceh from afar: A critical discourse analysis of Sharia law in BBC and CNN. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 659–670. https://doi.org/10.17509/nhqtpx84
- AlAfnan, M. A. (2022). Public discourse: Systemic functional analysis of Trump's and Biden's inaugural speeches. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.162
- Altohami, W. (2024). Self-framing and other-(re)framing in institutional political discourse: The case of Donald Trump's final speech before the UN. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(1), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1401.24
- Bartlett, T., & O'Grady, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. Routledge.
- Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press.
- Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2013). The functional analysis of English (3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Chanturidze, Y. (2018). Functional and linguistic characteristics of Donald Trump's victory and inaugural speeches. Journal of Language and Education, 4(4), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-4-31-41
- Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.
- Chung, W. (2021). Linguistic features of Donald Trump's political discourse: Focusing on genre differences and change over time. Language Facts and Perspectives, 52, 61–102.
- Demata, M. (2021). Keeping the threat out: Trump's discourse, the Wall, and the "Other". Altre Modernità, 25, 270–286. https://doi.org/10.13130/2035-7680/15601
- Derakhshani, M., Qaiwer, S. N., Kazemian, B., & Mohammadian, Sh. (2021). Critical discourse analysis and rhetorical tropes in Donald Trump's first speech to the UN. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 11(10), 1224–1236. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1110.10
- Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum.
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discourse power. Falmer Press.
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Webster, J. J. (2009). Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum.
- Hidayat, A. (2018). A transitivity analysis of Donald J. Trump's inauguration speech. English Language & Literature Journal, 7(3), 302–311.
- Hu, Y., & Li, H. (2025). Reframing China in US trade policy discourse: A context-deictic space model for ideological positioning. Frontiers in Communication, 10, Article 1598041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm. 2025.1598041
- Kazemian, B. (2014). Hallidayan ideational grammatical metaphor in specialized texts. Lambert Academic Publishing.
- Kazemian, B., & Hashemi, S. (2014). Nominalizations in scientific and political genres: Systemic functional linguistics perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 211–228. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2514388
- Kazemian, B., & Hashemi, S. (2017). A radical shift to a profound and rigorous investigation in political discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n3p115
- Kazemian, B., & Qaiwer, S. N. (2025). A functional analysis of metadiscourse markers in political discourse: Persuasive strategies in Netanyahu's speeches. Discourse and Interaction, 18(2), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.5817/di2025-2-120
- Khan, M. H., Adnan, H. M., Kaur, S., Khuhro, R. A., Asghar, R., & Jabeen, S. (2019). Muslims' representation in Donald Trump's anti-Muslim-Islam statement: A critical discourse analysis. Religions, 10(2), Article 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020115
- Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
- Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B., & Wang, P. (2023). Systemic functional grammar: A text-based description of English, Spanish and Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
- O'Connor, B., Cox, L., & Cooper, D. (2024). The ideology of American exceptionalism: American nationalism's nom de plume. Journal of Political Ideologies, 29(3), 634–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2022.2112126
- Pease, D. E. (2009). The new American exceptionalism. University of Minnesota Press.
- Putra, A. A., & Rudianto, G. (2024). An analysis of grammatical cohesion in Donald Trump's speech. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 7(5), 1055–1064. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/project/article/ view/23028
- Rabab'ah, G., Hussein, A., & Jarbou, S. (2024). Hate speech in political discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37, 2237–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10158-8
- Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 23–61). SAGE.
- Rong, J. (2021). An analysis on stylistic features of Donald Trump's speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(3), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n3p11
- Seo, S. (2013). Hallidayean transitivity analysis: The battle for Tripoli in the contrasting headlines of two national newspapers. Discourse & Society, 24(6), 774–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513503267
- Tang, B. (2021). Analysis of political metaphors in Donald J. Trump's State of the Union Address in 2020. English Literature and Language Review, 7(4), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.32861/ellr.74.69.73
- Taverniers, M., Simon-Vandenbergen, A., & Ravelli, L. J. (Eds.). (2003). Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics. Benjamins.
- Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge.
- van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2018). Is Trump always rambling like a fourth-grade student? An analysis of stylistic features of Donald Trump's political discourse during the 2016 election. Discourse & Society, 29(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734659
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Kazemian et al., 2026)
Reference: Kazemian, B., Mohammadian, S., & Qaiwer, S. N. (2026). Ideational grammatical metaphor and transitivity in Trump’s speeches: A Hallidayan perspective.
European Journal of Education & Language Review, 2(2), Article 3.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19180
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Kazemian B, Mohammadian S, Qaiwer SN. Ideational grammatical metaphor and transitivity in Trump’s speeches: A Hallidayan perspective.
European Journal of Education & Language Review. 2026;2(2), 3.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19180
Chicago
In-text citation: (Kazemian et al., 2026)
Reference: Kazemian, Bahram, Shafigeh Mohammadian, and Shatha Naiyf Qaiwer. "Ideational grammatical metaphor and transitivity in Trump’s speeches: A Hallidayan perspective".
European Journal of Education & Language Review 2026 2 no. 2 (2026): 3.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19180
Harvard
In-text citation: (Kazemian et al., 2026)
Reference: Kazemian, B., Mohammadian, S., and Qaiwer, S. N. (2026). Ideational grammatical metaphor and transitivity in Trump’s speeches: A Hallidayan perspective.
European Journal of Education & Language Review, 2(2), 3.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19180
MLA
In-text citation: (Kazemian et al., 2026)
Reference: Kazemian, Bahram et al. "Ideational grammatical metaphor and transitivity in Trump’s speeches: A Hallidayan perspective".
European Journal of Education & Language Review, vol. 2, no. 2, 2026, 3.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19180
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Kazemian B, Mohammadian S, Qaiwer SN. Ideational grammatical metaphor and transitivity in Trump’s speeches: A Hallidayan perspective. European Journal of Education & Language Review. 2026;2(2):3.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/19180