Asian Journal of Instruction
Research Article
2014, 2(1(ÖZEL)), pp. 18-30

THE INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING LEVELS

Published in Volume 2 Issue 1(ÖZEL): 01 Oct 2014
Download: 1
View: 3

Abstract

The reflection has been referred to as inquiry into one’s experience. Reflective activities encourage one’s to analyse their performance. In this context, it can be said reflective thinking had a critical place in education. Reflective thinking, which is be defined as questioning self action when it is happening and then organizing general information by thinking on the self action again, is considered as an important element for the teacher training process. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking levels towards mathematics point of view elementary pre-service mathematics teachers’ characteristics. This research was based on a relational survey method which is one of the general survey models. This research was carried out in the spring term of 2013-2014 academic year, all studying at the Marmara University, Education Faculty, Department of Teacher Training in Mathematics at Elementary School Level. The sample of the study consisted of 108 pre-service elementary mathematics teachers at the third year of their four-year mathematics teacher graduate program. To determine the pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking levels, data were collected using the “Reflective Thinking Scale” developed by Kember and his colleagues (2000) and adapted into Turkish by Başol and Gencel (2013). Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of Reflective Thinking Scale was found 0.75. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test and analysis of variance were employed to analyze quantitative data. According to the descriptive result, the average value of the levels of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking levels towards mathematics was 2.85 (df.:1.46). Results of the study revealed that pre-service elementary mathematics teachers have middle level of reflective thinking skill. According to the results, while there were significant differences in pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ views about reflective thinking levels towards mathematics in terms of the variable of the gender, there were not significant differences in reflective thinking levels towards mathematics in terms of the variables of the pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ education types and highschool the person graduated. According to the results of the data analysis, it was seen that the female pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking levels towards mathematics were significantly higher than male pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’. With regard to research findings, suggestions were offered for future studies by emphasizing the necessity for measures to increase pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ knowledge on reflective thinking as well as its use

  • Alkan, V. ve Gözel, E. (2012). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünme becerilerine ilişkin görüşleri. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy NWSA-Education Sciences, 8 (1), 1-12.
  • Aydın, M. ve Çelik, T. (2013). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünme becerilerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34 (2), 169-181.
  • Baki, A., Güç, F.A. ve Özmen, Z.M. (2012). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının problem çözmeye yönelik yansıtıcı düşünme becerilerinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2 (3), 59-72.
  • Bayrak, F. ve Koçak Usluel, Y. (2011). Ağ günlük uygulamasının yansıtıcı düşünme becerileri üzerine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 93-104.
  • Bigge, M.L., & Shermis, S.S. (1999). Learning theories for teachers. New York: Longman Inc.
  • Burns, M., Dimock, V., & Martinez, D. (2000). Action + reflection = Learning. Technology Assistance Program Newsletter: TAP into Learning, 3 (2), 1–4.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Brockbank, A. (2002). Reflective learning in pratice. Brookfield, VT, USA: Gover Publishing Limited.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. Newyork: Prometheus Books.
  • Duban, N. ve Yelken, T.Y. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünme eğilimleri ve yansıtıcı öğretmen özellikleriyle ilgili görüşleri. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,19 (2), 343-360.
  • Ferri, R.B. (2003), Mathematical Thinking Styles- An Empirical Study, European Research in Mathematics Education III, CERME-3. [Online] available: http://www.dm.unipi.it /~didattica/CERME3/proceedings/Groups/TG3/TG3_BorromeoFerri_cerme3 .pdf (June 18, 2009).
  • Fırat Durdukoca, Ş. ve Demir, M. (2012). İlköğretim öğretmenlerin bazı değişkenlere göre yansıtıcı düşünme düzeyleri ve düşüncelerindeki öğretmen niteliklerinin yansıtıcı öğretmen niteliklerine uygunluğu. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9 (20), 357-374.
  • Fallon, M.A., & Brown, S.C. (2002). Crossing over from student teaching to first year teaching. School of Education, 4 (1), 37-46.
  • Gelter, H. (2003). Why is reflective thinking uncommon? Reflective Thinking Practice, 4 (3), 337-344.
  • Hall, H., & Davison, B. (2007). Social software as support ın hybrid learning environments: the value of the blog as a tool for reflective learning and peer support. Library & Information Science Research, 29, 163-187.
  • Hasırcı, Ö.K. ve Sadık, F. (2011).Sınıf öğretmenlerinin yansıtıcı düşünme eğilimlerinin incelenmesi. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20 (2), 195-210.
  • Orland-Barak, L., & Hayuta, Y. (2007). When theory meets with practice: What student teachers learn from guided reflection on their own classroom discourse. Teaching and teacher education: An international journal of research and studies, 23 (6); 957-969.
  • Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching on Teacher Education, 18, 73-85.
  • Kan, A. (2009). Ölçme sonuçları üzerinde istatistiksel işlemler. H. Atılgan (Ed.), Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme (ss. 397–456). Anı Yayıncılık: Ankara.
  • Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel yay.
  • Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K. et al. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (4), 381-395.
  • Kılınç, H. H. (2010). İlköğretim birinci ve ikinci kademe öğretmenlerinin yansıtıcı düşünme eğilimler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
  • Kitchener, K.S., King, P.M., & DeLuca, S. (2006). Development of Reflective judgement in adulthood. In C. Hoare, (Eds.), Handbook of adult development and learning (pp. 73-98). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kirk, R. (2000). A study of the use of a private chat room to ıncrease reflective thinking in pre-service teachers. College Student Journal, 34 (1), 8-18.
  • Köksal, N. ve Demirel, Ö. (2008). Yansıtıcı düşünmenin öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik uygulamalarına katkıları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 189-203.
  • Langer, A. M. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Using learning journals in higher and continuing education. Teaching in higher education, 7 (3), 337-351.
  • Lee, H. J. (2005). Understanding and assessing preservice teachers’ reflective thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21 (1), 699-715.
  • Lee, I. (2007). Preparing preservice english teachers for reflective practice. ELT Journal, 61 (4), 321-329.
  • Meissner H. (2006). Creativity and Mathematics Education (çevirenler: Hülya Gür; Mehmet Ali Kandemir). İlköğretim Online, 5(1), 65-72.
  • Mewborn, D. S. (1999). Reflective thinking among preservice elemantary mathematics teachers.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (3), 316.
  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2008). Öğretmen yeterlikleri öğretmenlik mesleği genel ve özel alan yeterlikleri. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Basım Evi.
  • Moon, J. (1999). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. London, Routledge.
  • NG, C.S.L. ve Tan, C. (2006). Investigating Singapore pre-service teachers’ III-structured problem solving processes in an asynchronous online environment: Implications for reflective thinking. New Horizons in Education, A publication of the Hong Kong Teachers' Association, No:54.
  • Norton, J.L. (1994). Creative thinking and locus of control as predictors of reflective thinking in preservice teachers. [Online] Available: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ (July 20, 2011)
  • Norton, J. L. (1997). Locus control and reflective thinking in preservice teachers. Education Chula Vista, 117 (3), 401-410.
  • Osterman, K. F., & Kottkamp, R. B. (2004). Reflective practice for educators: Professional development to Improve student learning. (2nd ed.). CA: Corwin Press.
  • Övet, O. (2006). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğretmenlik mesleğini tercih etmelerinde etkili olan faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104 (4), 842-866.
  • Rogers, R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 37–57.
  • Roskos, K., Vukelich, C., & Risko, V. (2001). Reflection and learning to teach reading: A critical review of literacy and general teacher education studies. Journal of Literacy Research, 33 (4), 595-635.
  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Sternberg R.J., & Grigorenko, E.G. (2000). Teaching thinking for successful intelligence. Arlington Heights, II: Skylight
  • Şahin, Ç. (2009). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünme yeteneklerine göre günlüklerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 225-236.
  • Taggart, G.L., & Wilson, A.P. (2005). Promoting reflective thinking in teachers in 50 action strategies. USA: Corwin Pres.
  • Tezcan, M. (1996). Eğitim sosyolojisi. (10. Baskı), Ankara: Feryal Matbaa.
  • Thorpe, K. (2004). Reflective learning journals: From concept to practice. Reflective Practice International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 5 (3), 327–343.
  • Tok, Ş.(2008). Yansıtıcı düşünmeyi geliştirici etkinliklerin öğretmen adaylarının Öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumlarına, performanslarına ve yansıtmalarına Etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33 (149), 104-118.
  • Wenzlaff, T. (1994). Training the student to be a reflective practitioner. Training the Student Teacher, 115 (2), 278-288.
  • Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The Effect Of Peer Feedback For Blogging On College Students Reflective Learning Processes. The Internet and Higher Education. 11 (1), 18-25.
  • Yeh, Y.C. (2004). Nurturing reflective teaching during critical-thinking instruction in a computer simulation program. Computers and Education, 42 (2), 181-194.
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Erdoğan F, Şengül S. THE INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING LEVELS. Asian Journal of Instruction. 2014;2(1(ÖZEL)), 18-30.
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Erdoğan & Şengül, 2014)
Reference: Erdoğan, F., & Şengül, S. (2014). THE INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING LEVELS. Asian Journal of Instruction, 2(1(ÖZEL)), 18-30.
Chicago
In-text citation: (Erdoğan and Şengül, 2014)
Reference: Erdoğan, Fatma, and Sare Şengül. "THE INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING LEVELS". Asian Journal of Instruction 2014 2 no. 1(ÖZEL) (2014): 18-30.
Harvard
In-text citation: (Erdoğan and Şengül, 2014)
Reference: Erdoğan, F., and Şengül, S. (2014). THE INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING LEVELS. Asian Journal of Instruction, 2(1(ÖZEL)), pp. 18-30.
MLA
In-text citation: (Erdoğan and Şengül, 2014)
Reference: Erdoğan, Fatma et al. "THE INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING LEVELS". Asian Journal of Instruction, vol. 2, no. 1(ÖZEL), 2014, pp. 18-30.
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Erdoğan F, Şengül S. THE INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING LEVELS. Asian Journal of Instruction. 2014;2(1(ÖZEL)):18-30.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Submit My Manuscript



Phone: +31 (0)70 2190600 | E-Mail: info@lectitojournals.com

Address: Cultura Building (3rd Floor) Wassenaarseweg 20 2596CH The Hague THE NETHERLANDS

Disclaimer

This site is protected by copyright law. This site is destined for the personal or internal use of our clients and business associates, whereby it is not permitted to copy the site in any other way than by downloading it and looking at it on a single computer, and/or by printing a single hard-copy. Without previous written permission from Lectito BV, this site may not be copied, passed on, or made available on a network in any other manner.

Content Alert

Copyright © 2015-2025 LEUKOS BV All rights reserved.