Abstract
Leadership in high schools is undergoing a transformative shift as educational institutions adapt to the digital age. This study investigates the evolution of leadership styles from traditional to digital paradigms within the context of high schools. It examines how traditional leadership styles characterized by hierarchical authority and structured decision-making contrast with digital leadership practices, emphasizing technological integration, collaboration, and adaptability. The Complex Leadership Theory (CTL) serves as the theoretical foundation for the study. The study employed a correlation research design with a multi-stage sampling of 231 high school leaders in Oyo State, Nigeria, through structured questionnaires assessing their perceptions of traditional and digital leadership approaches. Two research questions were raised, and two hypotheses were formulated. Findings revealed traditional leadership's emphasis on structure and authority while acknowledging its limitations in fostering innovation and collaboration. In contrast, digital leadership practices were perceived as more effective in navigating the complexities of modern educational environments, with a strong focus on technological advancement and team-based approaches. The study finds a significant relationship between traditional and digital leadership styles, suggesting that elements of both can coexist effectively. The study concludes that integrating traditional and digital leadership could offer a balanced and responsive approach to contemporary educational leadership challenges.
- Anderson, M. H., and Sun, P. Y. (2017). Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full‐range’ theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12082
- Antonakis, J., Banks, G., Bastardoz, N., Cole, M., Day, D., Eagly, A., ... Haslam, A. (2019). The leadership quarterly: State of the journal. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.01.001
- Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. N. (2021). Associations between traditional and digital leadership in academic environment: During the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 405-428.https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01286
- Arena, M.J., and Uhl-Bien, M. (2016). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting from human capital to social capital. People and Strategy, 392, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
- Bach, C. and Sulíková, R. (2021). Leadership in the context of a new world: Digital leadership and industry 4.0. Manag. Glob. Transit., 19, 209–226. https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.19.209-226
- Balcı, A. (2014). Managing on the Edge of Chaos. In Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2012. Springer.
- Baltaci, A., and Balcı, A. (2017). Complexity Leadership: A Theorical Perspective. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 5(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2017.2435
- Barker, R. A. (2001). The nature of leadership. Human Relations, 54(4), 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726701544004
- Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Southern Public Administration Education Foundation, 17, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699408524907
- Bolden R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 133, 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x
- Bradbury, H., & Lichtenstein, B. (2000). “Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between,.” In Organization Science, 11(5), 551-564. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.5.551.15203
- Brown, M.E. and Gioia, D. A. (2002). “Making things click: Distributive leadership in an online division of an offline organization,.” Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00123-6
- Clark, T.N, and Lipset, S. (2001). The breakdown of class politics: A debate on post-industrial stratification (p. 352). Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
- Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., and Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalised world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology,10(1938). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
- De Waal, B., Van Outvorst, F., & Ravesteyn, P. (2016). Digital leadership: the objective - subjective dichotomy of technology revisited. 12th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance ECMLG, (November), 52–61.
- Demir, C., Yılmaz, M. K. and Cevirgen, A. (2010). Liderlik yaklaşımları ve liderlik tarzlarına ilişkin bir araştırma. Alanya Management Faculty Journal, 2(1), 129–152.
- Drucker, P. (2012). Managing in the next society. Routledge.
- Edmonstone, J. (2016). Complex adaptive leadership: Embracing paradox and uncertainty. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 13(1), 87–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2015.1130353
- El Sawy, O.A., Amsinck, H., Kræmmergaard, P. and Vinther, A. L. (2016). How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. (pp. 15. 141-166.).
- Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H. H., and Aydin, E. (2022). From conventional to digital leadership: exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1524–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338
- Franco, M. (2020). Digital leadership - A new leadership style for the 21st century ((1st ed.)). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77615
- Gilli, K., Lettner, N., and Guettel, W. (2024). The future of leadership: New digital skills or old analog virtues? Journal of Business Strategy, 45(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-06-2022-0093
- Gultekin, H., & Kara, T. (2022). Servant leadership characteristics of school teachers and its effect on student success and organizational health in selected public schools. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(4), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1303
- Hamzah, N. H., Nasir, K. M. and Abdul Wahab, J., Hamzah, N.H. Nasir, N. K. M., Wahab, J. A., and Hamzah, N. H., Nasir, K. M. and Abdul Wahab, J. (2021). The effects of principals’ digital leadership on teachers’ digital teaching during the covid-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(2), 216-221. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.82.216.221
- Harbani, Muna, N., & Judiarni, J. A. (2021). Digital Leadership in Facing Challenges in the Era Industrial Revolution 4.0. Webology,18(Special Issue), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V18SI05/WEB18275
- Hazy, J. K. (2006). Measuring leadership effectiveness in complex socio-technical systems. In Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/e402022008-001
- Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., Yirci, R., Papadakis, S., Ozdemir, T., and Demirkol, M. (2022). The Development and Evolution of Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Mapping Approach-Based Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316171
- Karakose, T., Polat, H., & Papadakis, S. (2021). Examining teachers’ perspectives on school principals’ digital leadership roles and technology capabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(23), 13448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313448
- Kiyak, A., and Bozkurt, F. (2020). A review on impact of leadership styles in organizations. Sakarya Üniversitesi İşletme Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.47542/sauied.651557
- Kıyak, A., & Bozkurt, G. (2020). A general overview to digital leadership concept. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Çalışmalar Dergisi, 1(1), 84-95. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gsijses/issue/72093/1160298
- Lewin, K., Lippit, R. & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in artificially created social climate. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366
- Liagouras, G. (2005). The political economy of post-industrial capitalism. Thesis Eleven, 811, 20–35. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/0725513605051612
- Lichtenstein, B. B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J. D., & Schreiber, C. (2006). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. 8(4). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/managementfacpub/8
- Lipman-Blumen, J. (1992). Connective leadership: Female leadership styles in the 21st-century workplace. Sociological Perspectives, 35(1), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389374
- Makhdoom, T. R., Shaikh, M. A., and Baloch, M. N. (2021). Traditional leadership styles influencing employee work behaviors in islamic banks of sindh, Pakistan. Journal Of Organizational Behavior Research, 6(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.51847/nh5euh6dnq
- Malakyan, P. G. (2020). Digital Leader-followership for the digital age: A North American perspective. In M. Franco (Ed.), Digital Leadership - A New Leadership Style for the 21st Century (pp. 59–82). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77615
- Manga, M. G. (2023). The impact of digital leadership and transformational leadership on digital transformation. An Unpublished research report of Degree of Master of Management in the field of Digital Business submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, University of the Witwatersrand.
- Marion, R. & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations, Leadership Quarterly, 12, 389–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00092-3
- Marion, R. & Uhl-Bien, M. (2003). Complexity theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining complex leadership, Emergence: Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management, 5, 56–78.
- Mihardjo, L., Sasmoko, S., Alamsjah, F., & Elidjen, E. (2019). Digital leadership role in developing business model innovation and customer experience orientation in industry 4.0. Management Science Letters, 9(11), 1749–1762. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.6.015
- Ming, G. K., & Mansor, M. (2024). Unveiling digital leadership : Exploring models and theories. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2024.5401
- Mustofa, Y.A. & Cahyono, B. (2022). The effect of transformational leadership and empowerment on employee performance. Central European Management Journal, 05(08), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.57030/23364890.cemj.30.4.78
- Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S., & Swamy, D. R. (2014). Leadership styles. Advances in Management, 7(2), 57.
- Narbona, J. (2016). Digital leadership, twitter, and pope francis. Church, Communication and Culture, 1(1), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2016.1181307
- Oberer, B. and Erkollar, A. (2018). “Leadership 4.0: digital leaders in the age of industry 4.0.” International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 7(4), 404–412. https://doi.org/doi:10.33844/ijol. 2018.60332
- Okunlola, J. O., Naicker, S. R., and Uleanya, C. (2024). Digital leadership in the fourth industrial revolution enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2317258
- Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Sage.
- Reid-Griffin, A., and Slaten, K. M. (2016). Wikis: Developing pre-service teachers’ leadership skills and knowledge of content standards. European Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.20897/lectito.201601
- Richardson, S. D. (2024). When participants embody the answer: A narrative case study of community leadership. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(4), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15167
- Rizvi, H. (2022). Traditional leadership style, approaches, theory, traits and examples. https://hidayatrizvi.com/traditional-leadership-style-approaches-theory-traits-and-examples/
- Rost, J. C. (1993). Leadership for the TwentyFirst Century (p. 220). Praeger. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920040210
- Sabrina, R., Sulasmi, E., & Akrim, A. (2022). How does self-sacrificial leadership affect knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding?: Organization’s cultural prospective. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(2), 96–120. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1165
- Sagbasi, M and Erdogan, F. (2022). Digital leadership: A systematic conceptual review. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi.
- Seleari, F. (2021). Leadership styles effect by traditional organizations and the relation with job satisfaction during digital transformation. Unpublished Master’s Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of the Postgraduate Title on Business Administration (MBA) by the Faculty of Economics and Management of the Open University of Cyprus.
- Shaari, R., Kamarudin, D., Ju, S.-Y., & Zakaria, H. (2022). Effects of Leadership types on job satisfaction among malaysian higher education institutions. Asian Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.1020324
- Șișu, J. A. (2023). Digital leadership competencies: A systematic literature review. Review of International Comparative Management, 24(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.24818/rmci.2023.1.69
- Souza, E. M. de M., & Pietrafesa, P. A. (2023). Leadership and digital transformation. Journal of Business Administration Research, 12(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.5430/jbar.v12n2p9
- Steeves, K., Smith, L., Kreiter, E., & Stobbe, J. (2025). Investigating the intellectual bifurcation between feminist theory and sociology of religious leadership. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16020
- Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 184., 298–318. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
- Yusof, M. R., Yaakob, M. F. M., and Ibrahim, M. Y. (2019). Digital leadership among school leaders in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(9), 1481–1485. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.i8221.078919
- Yusup, M. (2022). The concept of leadership in traditional and modern. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 2(1), 41–49.https://doi.org/10.54443/injoe.v2i1.9
- Zhao, Y. (2020). COVID-19 as a catalyst for educational change. Prospects, 49(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020- 09477-y
- Zhong, L. (2017). Indicators of digital leadership in the context of K-12 education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 10(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1001.03
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Okunlola JO, Naicker SR. Deconstructing leadership in the post-industrial era: A comparative study of traditional leadership styles and digital leadership practices in high schools.
European Journal of STEM Education. 2025;10(1), 26.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17375
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Okunlola & Naicker, 2025)
Reference: Okunlola, J. O., & Naicker, S. R. (2025). Deconstructing leadership in the post-industrial era: A comparative study of traditional leadership styles and digital leadership practices in high schools.
European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 26.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17375
Chicago
In-text citation: (Okunlola and Naicker, 2025)
Reference: Okunlola, John Olayemi, and Suraiya Rathankoomar Naicker. "Deconstructing leadership in the post-industrial era: A comparative study of traditional leadership styles and digital leadership practices in high schools".
European Journal of STEM Education 2025 10 no. 1 (2025): 26.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17375
Harvard
In-text citation: (Okunlola and Naicker, 2025)
Reference: Okunlola, J. O., and Naicker, S. R. (2025). Deconstructing leadership in the post-industrial era: A comparative study of traditional leadership styles and digital leadership practices in high schools.
European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 26.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17375
MLA
In-text citation: (Okunlola and Naicker, 2025)
Reference: Okunlola, John Olayemi et al. "Deconstructing leadership in the post-industrial era: A comparative study of traditional leadership styles and digital leadership practices in high schools".
European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 10, no. 1, 2025, 26.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17375
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Okunlola JO, Naicker SR. Deconstructing leadership in the post-industrial era: A comparative study of traditional leadership styles and digital leadership practices in high schools. European Journal of STEM Education. 2025;10(1):26.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17375