Download: 249
View: 520

Abstract

Empowering students with a robust Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education, while equipping their teachers with comprehensive training, fosters critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are important aspects of innovation, social progress, and advancement. The main objective of this study is to investigate how a STEM-lab activity - an experimental chemistry laboratory activity integrated with Arduino prototyping - implemented within a teacher education program can promote the development of professional knowledge that enables the development of activities aligned with the STEM approach among pre-service teachers. Twenty Portuguese pre-service physics and chemistry teachers participated in the study. Pre- and post-activity tests, incorporating closed and open-ended questions, were used to assess participants' perceptions. Data analysis included quantitative assessment of conceptual gains and qualitative content analysis of reflective responses. The results suggest that the activity fosters a reflective process among pre-service chemistry teachers, enabling them to integrate STEM components with a socio-scientific contextual approach and encouraging critical consideration of adapting STEM activities for greater applicability and effectiveness in secondary education. While this approach significantly enhances pedagogical effectiveness, challenges persist in identifying aspects related to engineering and using Arduino prototyping.
  • Ali, R., Wardat, Y., Saleh, S., & Alshraifin, N. (2024). Evaluation of STEM-Aligned Teaching Practices for Gifted Mathematics Teachers. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 08. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/14625
  • Ambrož, M., Pernaa, J., Haatainen, O., & Aksela, M. (2023). Promoting STEM Education of Future Chemistry Teachers with an Engineering Approach Involving Single-Board Computers. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 3278. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053278
  • August, L. (2023). Integrating STEM Curriculum Across the Schools’ Learning Environment to Reflect & Impact Life Practices. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i20.14608
  • Aydin-Gunbatar, S., Ekiz-Kiran, B., & Oztay, E. S. (2020). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for integrated STEM development with LESMeR model. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00074D
  • Aydin, S., Öztay, E. S., & Ekiz, B. (2021). Examination of pre-service chemistry teachers’ STEM conceptions through an integrated STEM course. Turkish Journal of Education, 10(4), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.894588
  • Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2013). Investigating the effectiveness of predict-observe- explain strategy on teaching photo electricity topic. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/13.12.548
  • Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de Conteúdo [Content Analysys] (1st ed., Vol. 1). Edições 70.
  • Bicer, A., Lee, Y., & Perihan, C. (2020). Inclusive STEM High School Factors Influencing Ethnic Minority Students’ STEM Preparation. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/384
  • Boy, G. A. (2013). From STEM to STEAM. Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501907.2501934
  • Bush, S. B., Cox, R., & Cook, K. L. (2016). A critical focus on the M in STEAM. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(2), 110–114.https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.23.2.0110
  • Bybee, R. W. (2013). A case for STEM education (C. Reinburg, J. Horak, A. Cooke, & W. Rubin, Eds.). Arlington: National Science Teachers’ Association Press.
  • Coskun Karabulut, H., Elcan kaynak, N., & Kariper, I. A. (2023). Pre service teachers’ engagement with stem-based hands-on activities in online chemistry laboratory courses. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2215170
  • de Vera, G. A., Brown, B. Y., Cortesa, S., Dai, M., Bruno, J., LaPier, J., Sule, N., Hancock, M., Yoon, B., Chalah, A., Sunderland, E. M., & Wofsy, S. C. (2022). HazeL: A Low-Cost Learning Platform for Aerosol Measurements. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(9), 3203–3210. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00535
  • Deniş Çeliker, H. (2020). The Effects of Scenario-Based STEM Project Design Process with Pre-service Science Teachers: 21st Century Skills and Competencies, Integrative STEM Teaching Intentions and STEM Attitudes. Journal of Educational Issues, 6(2), 451. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v6i2.17993
  • Dökme, İ., & Koyunlu Ünlü, Z. (2023). An effective intervention using STEM instruction for improving preservice science teachers’ self-efficacy. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2209847
  • Durbin, P. T. (1991). Defining STS: Can we Reach Consensus? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 11(4–5), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769101100401
  • English, L. D. (2017). Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
  • Famularo, N., Kholod, Y., & Kosenkov, D. (2016). Integrating Chemistry Laboratory Instrumentation into the Industrial Internet: Building, Programming, and Experimenting with an Automatic Titrator. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00494
  • Fernández, L., Fernández Serra, R. M., Jiménez, P., Marco, S., Caballero, E., Arimany-Nardi, C., Pardo, A. (2024). A Service-Learning Experience in Secondary Education to Promote STEM Learning Through Collaboration Between Research and Education Centers. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 09. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/14649
  • Fleischer, T., Feichtner, J., Strauß, I., & Strahl, A. (2024). Everyday referenced use of a digital temperature sensor – how well do alternative ice cubes really cool a drink? Chemistry Teacher International, 6(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2023-0067
  • García, J. A., & Espinosa, M. P. P. (2020). Methodologies & Technologies to teach STEM in Primary Education: needs analysis. Pixel-bit- revista de medios y educacion, 57, 107–128. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2020.i57.04
  • Gettings, M. (2016). Putting It All Together: STEAM, PBL, Scientific Method, and the Studio Habits of Mind. Art Education, 69(4), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176472
  • Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple Representations in Chemical Education (J. K. Gilbert & D. Treagust, Eds.; Vol. 4). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8
  • Girotto Júnior, G., De Paula, M. A., & Matazo, D. R. C. (2019). Analysis of knowledge about teaching strategies of future chemistry teachers: experience as a student and reflection as a teacher. Góndola, Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de Las Ciencias, 14(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.14483/23464712.13123
  • Gomes, V. V., Cavaco, S. C. F., Morgado, C. P., Aires-de-Sousa, J., & Fernandes, J. C. B. (2020). An Arduino-Based Talking Calorimeter for Inclusive Lab Activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(6), 1677–1681. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00148
  • Greenbowe, T. J. (1997). Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199704)34:4<377::AID-TEA7>3.3.CO;2-E
  • Grewe, F. (2025). The Need for Diffraction in STEM-Fields: An Ethical Feminist Consideration of the Concept of Gender Scripting. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16786
  • Güngör Seyhan, H., & Eyceyurt Türk, G. (2023). Examination of Conceptual Understandings Among Prospective Science Teachers on Electrolytic Conductivity Using Predict-Observe-Explain Implications. International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 14(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijrte.2023.523.4
  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
  • Hilario, J. (2015). The Use of Predict-Observe-Explain-Explore (POEE) as a New Teaching Strategy in General Chemistry-Laboratory. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(2), 37–48.
  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
  • Hodson, D. (2020). Going Beyond STS Education: Building a Curriculum for Sociopolitical Activism. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(4), 592–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00114-6
  • Hussim, Hairunnisa, Roslinda Rosli, Nurul Aisya Zahira Mohd Nor, Siti Mistima Maat, Muhammad Sofwan Mahmud, Zanaton Iksan, Azmin Sham Rambely, Siti Nurdiyana Mahmud, Lilia Halim, Kamisah Osman, and Ah Nam Lay. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review of Informal STEM Learning. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 07. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/14609
  • Jho, H., Hong, O., & Song, J. (2016). An Analysis of STEM/STEAM Teacher Education in Korea with a Case Study of Two Schools from a Community of Practice Perspective. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1538a
  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
  • Kant, J. M., Burckhard, S. R., & Meyers, R. T. (2018). Engaging High School Girls in Native American Culturally Responsive STEAM Enrichment Activities. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 8(5), 15–25.
  • Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Pektaş, H. M. (2023). Developing students’ creative problem-solving skills with inquiry-based STEM activity in an out-of-school learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7651–7669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11496-5
  • Karpudewan, M., & Daman Huri, N. H. (2023). Interdisciplinary Electrochemistry STEM-Lab Activities Replacing the Single Disciplinary Electrochemistry Curriculum for Secondary Schools. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(2), 998–1010. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00469
  • Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
  • Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM Ahead: The Benefits of Integrating the Arts Into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317
  • Leopold, H., & Smith, A. (2019). Implementing Reflective Group Work Activities in a Large Chemistry Lab to Support Collaborative Learning. Education Sciences, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010007
  • Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
  • Mc Goldrick, N. B., Marzec, B., Scully, P. N., & Draper, S. M. (2013). Implementing a Multidisciplinary Program for Developing Learning, Communication, and Team-Working Skills in Second-Year Undergraduate Chemistry Students. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(3), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200643g
  • Morais, C., & Araújo, J. L. (2023). An Alternative Experimental Procedure to Determine the Solubility of Potassium Nitrate in Water with Automatic Data Acquisition Using Arduino for Secondary School: Development and Validation with Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(2), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00615
  • Morais, C., André, C., Alves, J., & Girotto Junior, G. (2024). Looking at Electrochemistry through a Concentration Cell: A High School Laboratory Activity Integrated into a Data Access System Explored with Preservice Chemistry Teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(11), 4580–4589. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00424
  • Morais, C., Ferreira, A., & Araújo, J. (2021). Qualitative polymer analysis lab through inquiry-based. Educaíon Química, 32(1).
  • Olalowo, I. E. (2020). Accounts and Thoughts of Overage Children: A Qualitative Study on the Physical and Emotional Environment of Preschools in Ibadan, Nigeria. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8390
  • Ortiz-Revilla, J., Greca, I. M., & Arriassecq, I. (2022). A Theoretical Framework for Integrated STEM Education. Science & Education, 31(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x
  • Paiva, J., Morais, C., & Moreira, L. (2017). Activities with Parents on the Computer: An Ecological Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 1–14.
  • Park, H., Byun, S., Sim, J., Han, H.-S., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of STEAM Education in South Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a
  • Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20435
  • Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
  • Pino, H., Pastor, V., Grimalt-Álvaro, C., & López, V. (2019). Measuring CO 2 with an Arduino: Creating a Low-Cost, Pocket-Sized Device with Flexible Applications That Yields Benefits for Students and Schools. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00473
  • Rahayu, S., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2022). High School and Preservice Chemistry Teacher Education Students’ Understanding of Voltaic and Electrolytic Cell Concepts: Evidence of Consistent Learning Difficulties Across Years. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(8), 1859–1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10226-6
  • Rodriguez-Vasquez, K. A., Cole, A. M., Yordanova, D., Smith, R., & Kidwell, N. M. (2020). AIRduino: On-Demand Atmospheric Secondary Organic Aerosol Measurements with a Mobile Arduino Multisensor. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(3), 838–844. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00744
  • Santos, R. A. dos, & Auler, D. (2019). STS educational practices: seeking social participation beyond the assessment of the impacts of Science-Technology on Society. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 25(2), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320190020013
  • Santos, W. L. P. (2012). Educação CTS e cidadania: confluências e diferenças. [STS education and citizenship: confluences and diferences] Amazônia: Revista de Educação Em Ciências e Matemáticas, 9(17), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.18542/amazrecm.v9i17.1647
  • Santos, W. L. P. dos. (2007). Scientific education from the perspective of literacy as a social practice: functions, principles and challenges. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 12(36), 474–492. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782007000300007
  • Schmidt, M., & Fulton, L. (2016). Transforming a Traditional Inquiry-Based Science Unit into a STEM Unit for Elementary Pre-service Teachers: A View from the Trenches. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9594-0
  • Shahidullah, K. K., & Hossain, M. R. (2022). Designing an Integrated Undergraduate Disaster STEM Curriculum: A Cultural Shift in Higher Education Curriculum Development in Bangladesh. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(1), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1042
  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (2013). Mathematics in a STEM Context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 324. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.6.0324
  • Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
  • Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8
  • Song, H., & Zhou, M. (2021). STEM Teachers’ Preparation, Teaching Beliefs, and Perceived Teaching Competence: a Multigroup Structural Equation Approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(3), 394–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09881-1
  • Spitha, N., Zhang, Y., Pazicni, S., Fullington, S., Morais, C., Buchberger, A. R. & Doolittle, P. (2024). Supporting Submicroscopic Reasoning in Students’ Explanations of Absorption Phenomena using a Simulation-Based Activity. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25, 133-150. DOI: https://doi.org/
  • 10.1039/D3RP00153A
  • Spyropoulou, N., & Kameas, A. (2023). Augmenting the Impact of STEAM Education by Developing a Competence Framework for STEAM Educators for Effective Teaching and Learning. Education Sciences, 14(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010025
  • Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 14(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E
  • Tang, K., & Williams, P. J. (2019). STEM literacy or literacies? Examining the empirical basis of these constructs. Review of Education, 7(3), 675–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3162
  • Thompson, J., & Soyibo, K. (2002). Effects of Lecture, Teacher Demonstrations, Discussion and Practical Work on 10th Graders’ Attitudes to Chemistry and Understanding of Electrolysis. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140220130902
  • Tsang, M. K. Y. (2021). Science and Language connect the world - When STEM meets STSE with CLIL beyond a classroom context in Hong Kong. In Y.-J. Lee & J. Park (Eds.), Vision for Science Education Research. ISEC - STEM Conference (pp. 24–45). National Institute of Education.
  • Tsaparlis, G. (2019). Teaching and Learning Electrochemistry. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6–7), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800071
  • United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report.
  • White, R., & Gunstone, R. (2014). Probing Understanding. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203761342
  • Widyasari, F., Masykuri, M., Mahardiani, L., Saputro, S., & Yamtinah, S. (2022). Measuring the Effect of Subject-Specific Pedagogy on TPACK through Flipped Learning in E-Learning Classroom. International Journal Of Instruction, 15(3), 1007–1030. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15354a
  • Yıldız, M., & Ecevit, T. (2024). Impact of STEM on Primary School Students' 21st Century Skills, NOS, and Learning Experiences. Asian Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.1395298
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Morais C, Junior GG, André C. Exploring a Contextualized STEM Integration in Chemistry Education Laboratory: Insights from Pre-Service Teacher Training. European Journal of STEM Education. 2025;10(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17213
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Morais et al., 2025)
Reference: Morais, C., Junior, G. G., & André, C. (2025). Exploring a Contextualized STEM Integration in Chemistry Education Laboratory: Insights from Pre-Service Teacher Training. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17213
Chicago
In-text citation: (Morais et al., 2025)
Reference: Morais, Carla, Gildo Girotto Junior, and Cidália André. "Exploring a Contextualized STEM Integration in Chemistry Education Laboratory: Insights from Pre-Service Teacher Training". European Journal of STEM Education 2025 10 no. 1 (2025): 18. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17213
Harvard
In-text citation: (Morais et al., 2025)
Reference: Morais, C., Junior, G. G., and André, C. (2025). Exploring a Contextualized STEM Integration in Chemistry Education Laboratory: Insights from Pre-Service Teacher Training. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17213
MLA
In-text citation: (Morais et al., 2025)
Reference: Morais, Carla et al. "Exploring a Contextualized STEM Integration in Chemistry Education Laboratory: Insights from Pre-Service Teacher Training". European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 10, no. 1, 2025, 18. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17213
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Morais C, Junior GG, André C. Exploring a Contextualized STEM Integration in Chemistry Education Laboratory: Insights from Pre-Service Teacher Training. European Journal of STEM Education. 2025;10(1):18. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17213
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Submit My Manuscript



Phone: +31 (0)70 2190600 | E-Mail: info@lectitojournals.com

Address: Cultura Building (3rd Floor) Wassenaarseweg 20 2596CH The Hague THE NETHERLANDS

Disclaimer

This site is protected by copyright law. This site is destined for the personal or internal use of our clients and business associates, whereby it is not permitted to copy the site in any other way than by downloading it and looking at it on a single computer, and/or by printing a single hard-copy. Without previous written permission from Lectito BV, this site may not be copied, passed on, or made available on a network in any other manner.

Content Alert

Copyright © 2015-2025 LEUKOS BV All rights reserved.