Abstract
The assessment of STEM thinking in elementary education remains dominated by product-oriented measurement, often overlooking the lived processes through which students’ reasoning develops in classroom practice. This study employs a qualitative phenomenological approach to explore how elementary school teachers experience, interpret, and negotiate the assessment of STEM thinking within authentic learning contexts. Data were generated through in-depth semi-structured interviews with teachers experienced in implementing STEM-related activities and analyzed using phenomenological thematic procedures to reveal the essential structure of their experiences. Findings indicate that assessment is lived as (1) process-oriented yet constrained by product accountability, (2) centered on interpreting invisible, relational, and evolving student thinking, and (3) continuously negotiated between structural limitation and pedagogical possibility. These insights support a conceptual shift from viewing STEM assessment as outcome measurement toward understanding it as situated meaning-making shaped by teacher agency and classroom context. The study proposes a phenomenology of STEM assessment that contributes to global discussions on authentic evaluation, teacher professionalism, and 21st-century learning. Empirically, the findings highlight how teachers negotiate between institutional accountability and the evolving nature of students’ STEM thinking in authentic classroom contexts. Practically, the study underscores the importance of developing more process-sensitive and interpretive assessment practices in elementary STEM education
- Acar, E., Deiri, Y., & Yigit, F. (2025). A focused review of artificial intelligence in education: Evolution and challenges. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence and Society, 1(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.20897/jirais/17640
- Ahn, H., & Kim, H. (2025). Impact of teaching practicum experiences through teaching portfolios on the agency of pre-service science teachers. Brain and Development, 15(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.31216/bdl.2025.15.2.5
- Alazri, A., & Shahat, M. (2025). Enhancing systems thinking in elementary science education: A STEM-based approach for fourth-grade learners. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 17(4), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2025.404
- Aldiabat, K. M., Musa, M., Shubair, M., Subrata, S. A., Kennedy, K., & Kimberley, L. (2025). Against the current: Lived experiences of nursing educators with concept-based curriculum in Canada. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(1), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16033
- AlGhamdi, R. (2025). Effectiveness of using the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach in developing higher-order thinking skills: A meta-analysis. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(4), 1592–1609. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i4.6895
- Amrina, Z., Sari, S., Alfino, J., & Amelia, P. (2024). Developing HOTS-based mathematics assessment instruments to improve critical thinking skills of prospective elementary school teachers. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v8i1.9839
- Aslam, S., Alghamdi, A., Abid, N., & Kumar, T. (2023). Challenges in implementing STEM education: Insights from novice STEM teachers in developing countries. Sustainability, 15(19), Article 14455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914455
- Bakytkazy, T., Nurgaliyeva, K., Balta, N., Zhumabay, N., Tzafilkou, K., & Nadelson, L. S. (2025). Unveiling the landscape of STEM education research in teaching: Teachers' perceptions and practices. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.20897/ ejsteme/17355
- Beck, S., Jones, K., Storm, S., & Smith, H. (2020). Scaffolding students' writing processes through dialogic assessment. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(6), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/ jaal.1039
- Bicer, A., Lee, Y., & Perihan, C. (2020). Inclusive STEM high school factors influencing ethnic minority students' STEM preparation. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/384
- Bloodworth, A., Conner, A., Miller, C., Franco, L., Foutz, T., & Hill, R. (2023). Robotics and coding: A framework for examining cognitive demand. Journal of Technology Education, 35(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.631
- Burton, M., Cardullo, V., & Tripp, L. (2020). Multiple perspectives of mathematics in STEM among preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-01-2020-0002
- Burus, T., Thompson, J., McAfee, C., Williams, L., Knight, J., Huang, B., & Hull, P. (2024). A framework and process for community-engaged, mixed-methods cancer needs assessments. Cancer Causes & Control, 35(10), 1319–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01892-2
- Cao, T. (2025). Formative assessment for self-regulated learning in English language education: Student perspectives. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 41(6), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5509
- Delcheva, T., & Georgieva, E. (2020). The student portfolio-interactive technology for quality of the practical pedagogical preparation of the students. The Yearbook of the Faculty of Education, 17. https://doi.org/10.15547/ybfe.2020.04
- Dolgopolovas, V., & Dagienė, V. (2024). Competency-based TPACK approaches to computational thinking and integrated STEM: A conceptual exploration. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22788
- Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. (2025). Integrating learning theories and innovative pedagogies in STEM education: A comprehensive review. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 5(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/16538
- Goos, M., Carreira, S., & Namukasa, I. (2023). Mathematics and interdisciplinary STEM education: Recent developments and future directions. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1199–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01533-z
- Gunarti, W., Pujianti, Y., & Syarah, E. (2020). STEAM to R-SLAMET modification: An integrative thematic play-based learning with R-SLAMETS content in early childhood education. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 14(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.142.05
- Herwin, H., Dahalan, S. C., Ilyas, M., & Ma'rufi, M. (2026). Gendered and cultural bias in elementary school assessment: DIF as evidence of epistemic inequality. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), Article 33. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18548
- Herwin, H., Pristiwaluyo, T., Ruslan, R., & Dahalan, S. C. (2022). Do scoring techniques and number of choices affect the reliability of multiple-choice tests in elementary schools? Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(4), 1258–1268. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i4.7149
- Holincheck, N., Galanti, T., & Butler, T. (2024). Promoting teachers' advocacy and agency for equity in STEM education through research and reflection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(10), 2468–2495. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21970
- Ibrahim, M., Herwin, H., Retnawati, H., Firdaus, F. M., & Umar, U. (2024). STEM learning for students' mathematical numeracy ability. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/15750
- Ismail, M., Shavega, T., & Kigobe, J. (2024). Competence-based assessment in pre-primary school classrooms: The case of pre-primary schools in Dar es Salaam Region, Tanzania. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 5(6), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.47505/ijrss.2024.6.9
- Jiang, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Q. (2022). An ecological approach to understanding university English teachers' professional agency in implementing formative assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 916980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916980
- Kloser, M., Borko, H., Wilsey, M., & Rafanelli, S. (2022). Leveraging portfolios in professional development for middle school science teachers' assessment and data-use practice. Science Education, 106(4), 924–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21712
- Kononets, N., Danysko, O., & Babenko, I. (2025). Resource-based model of teacher pedagogical skills development in STEM education practice. The Sources of Pedagogical Skills, (36), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.33989/2075-146x.2025.36.339437
- Köşger, N., & Görgülü, A. (2025). Pre-service science teachers' views on philosophical and scientific books in the nature of science course. ISophos: International Journal of Information, Technology and Philosophy, 8(15), 31–62.
- Kulakoğlu, B., & Kondakçı, Y. (2022). STEM education as a concept borrowing issue: Perspectives of school administrators in Turkey. ECNU Review of Education, 6(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 20965311221107390
- Kusters, M., Vetten, A., Admiraal, W., & Rijst, R. (2024). Developing scenarios for exploring teacher agency in universities: A multimethod study. Frontline Learning Research, 12(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v12i2.1419
- Lesseig, K., Slavit, D., & Simpson, A. (2023). Transdisciplinary STEM: Examples of student thinking within nonformal learning experiences. Education Sciences, 13(5), Article 435. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/educsci13050435
- Li, L., & Ruppar, A. (2020). Conceptualizing teacher agency for inclusive education: A systematic and international review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0888406420926976
- Ma, Y. (2021). Reconceptualizing STEM education in China as praxis: A curriculum turn. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 4961. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094961
- Martins, N. (2021). Adam Smith and the Cambridge Platonists. Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy, 29(58), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.5840/philosophica2021295816
- Mayo-Rota, C., Abós, Á., García-Cazorla, J., Villafaña-Samper, Z., & García-González, L. (2025). Study protocol of a non-randomized controlled trial on a circumplex model-based motivational training program for pre-service physical education teachers. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article 1611556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1611556
- Melawati, Y., Rochmiyati, R., & Nurhanurawati, N. (2022). A needs analysis of HOTS-based assessment instruments for elementary school mathematics learning. Asian Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.53402/ajet.v1i2.41
- Mishra, S., & Gupta, S. (2023). Analysis of the levels of awareness of school teachers toward STEM education. Journal of Teacher Education and Research, 18(1), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.36268/ jter/18104
- Morais, C., Júnior, G., & Andre, C. (2025). Exploring a contextualized STEM integration in chemistry education laboratory: Insights from pre-service teacher training. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17213
- Moreira, P., Blowers, P., Elfring, L., & Talanquer, V. (2025). Insights from an instructional team model focused on formative assessment with the support of learning researchers. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00043-25
- Mufanechiya, A., & Makgalwa, M. (2024). Re-visioning Zimbabwe's science, technology, engineering and mathematics for secondary schools through the science teacher education programme. Journal of Education and Learning Technology, 111–129. https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.2024564
- Neally, K. (2022). An analysis of the underrepresentation of minoritized groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. School Science and Mathematics, 122(5), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12542
- Pérez-Montilla, A., & Arnal-Palacián, M. (2023). An approach to the teacher educator's pedagogical content knowledge for the development of professional noticing in pre-service teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(6), Article 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060544
- Prahesti, V., Fatonah, S., & Maisarah, A. (2023). Implementation of HOTS assessment in Islamic religion lesson in 3rd grade Islamic elementary school East Java. Mudarrisa: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 15(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.18326/mdr.v15i1.42-59
- Prince, A. (2023). Culturally and socially responsible assessment: Theory, research, and practice. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(1), 222–225. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12871
- Pujianti, Y., Syarah, E., & Gunarti, W. (2023). Teacher's understanding of project learning models through children's comics with STEAM content in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 17(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.171.06
- Quileste, R. (2025). Whose standards? Examining power, fairness, and voice in pre-service teachers' conceptions of assessment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 14(2), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v14i2.8065
- Rizki, R., Mustadi, A., & Wangid, M. (2022). Evaluation of the implementation of assessment in higher order thinking skills oriented learning 2013 curriculum in elementary schools. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 4363–4370. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.757
- Salamanca, E., Medina-Castellano, K., Wilhelm, J., & Fisher, M. (2023). How teaching experience and physics and mathematics content knowledge impact professional noticing skills of STEM graduate
- Sarkar, R. (2025). Global agendas and education reforms: A comparative study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education and Society, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/apjes/17469
- Sohsomboon, P., & Yuenyong, C. (2022). Examining in-service teachers' initial perceptions toward STEM education in Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 37(2), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2022.37.2.16
- Susanti, D., Prasetyo, Z., & Retnawati, H. (2020). Analysis of elementary school teachers' perspectives on STEM implementation. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.21831/ jpe.v8i1.31262
- Swanepoel, N., & West, J. (2024). Collaborative conversations with teachers about hope: During and after COVID-19. Koers: Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, 89(1). https://doi.org/10.19108/koers. 89.1.2573
- Tan, L., & Wei, B. (2024). How science teachers deal with STEM education: An explorative study from the lens of curriculum ideology. Science Education, 109(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ sce.21904
- Vincent, C., McClure, H., Svanks, R., Girvan, E., Inglish, J., Reiley, D., & Smith, S. (2023). What should a restorative classroom look and sound like? Content validation of a direct observation tool. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 17(3), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-03-2023-0028
- Waheed, Z., Tham, J., & Keat, O. (2025). Investigating the implementation of formative assessment strategies by teachers in Maldivian government primary grades. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/v05i03y2025-03
- Webb, R. (2026). Post pandemic English language teacher development: A global perspective. European Journal of Education & Language Review, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/17719
- Winarto, W., Rosana, D., Wibowo, W. S., Rahayu, D. P., Pradana, P. W., & Shidiq, G. A. (2025). The impact of STEM-EfSD games on enhancing students' creative thinking and environmental literacy. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17354
- Yahaya, A., & Mwila, P. (2024). The role of formative assessment in enhancing biology learning: Evidence from secondary schools in Dar es Salaam City Council, Tanzania. CRAJ, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.55677/craj/03-2024-vol01i6
- Yang, D., Wu, X., Liu, J., & Zhou, J. (2023). CiteSpace-based global science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education knowledge mapping analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1094959. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1094959
- Yılmaz, A., Aras, S., Ülker, A., & Şahin, F. (2021). Reconceptualising the role of the child portfolio in assessment: How it serves for 'assessment as learning'. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 24(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491211048002
- Zainil, M., Kenedi, A., Indrawati, T., & Handrianto, C. (2022). The influence of a STEM-based digital classroom learning model and high-order thinking skills on the 21st-century skills of elementary school students in Indonesia. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4336
- Zakhari, N., Taccone, M., Torres, C., Chakraborty, S., Sinclair, J., Woulfe, J., & Nguyen, T. (2021). Qualitative assessment of advanced MRI in post-treatment high grade gliomas follow up: Do we agree? Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 73(1), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 08465371211013568
- Zhong, S. (2024). The effect of classroom teacher-student interaction characteristics and STEM teaching models on student creativity. SHS Web of Conferences, 193, Article 02009. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419302009
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Herwin et al., 2026)
Reference: Herwin, H., Che Dahalan, S., Olapane, E., Prananto, I. W., & Wirawan, P. R. (2026). Assessing STEM thinking in elementary classrooms: Evidence from teachers’ perspectives.
European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 31.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18597
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Herwin H, Che Dahalan S, Olapane E, Prananto IW, Wirawan PR. Assessing STEM thinking in elementary classrooms: Evidence from teachers’ perspectives.
European Journal of STEM Education. 2026;11(1), 31.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18597
Chicago
In-text citation: (Herwin et al., 2026)
Reference: Herwin, Herwin, Shakila Che Dahalan, Elias Olapane, Irfan Wahyu Prananto, and Pradita Rizky Wirawan. "Assessing STEM thinking in elementary classrooms: Evidence from teachers’ perspectives".
European Journal of STEM Education 2026 11 no. 1 (2026): 31.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18597
Harvard
In-text citation: (Herwin et al., 2026)
Reference: Herwin, H., Che Dahalan, S., Olapane, E., Prananto, I. W., and Wirawan, P. R. (2026). Assessing STEM thinking in elementary classrooms: Evidence from teachers’ perspectives.
European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 31.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18597
MLA
In-text citation: (Herwin et al., 2026)
Reference: Herwin, Herwin et al. "Assessing STEM thinking in elementary classrooms: Evidence from teachers’ perspectives".
European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2026, 31.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18597
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Herwin H, Che Dahalan S, Olapane E, Prananto IW, Wirawan PR. Assessing STEM thinking in elementary classrooms: Evidence from teachers’ perspectives. European Journal of STEM Education. 2026;11(1):31.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18597