Abstract
STEM education has become central to fostering the problem-solving and innovation capacities required in knowledge-based societies, prompting global reforms that seek to connect science, technology, engineering, and mathematics through authentic classroom learning. In Saudi Arabia, national initiatives, notably Vision 2030, reflect this momentum toward innovation and interdisciplinary integration. Yet how these ambitions translate into day-to-day mathematics instruction remains insufficiently understood. This qualitative-dominant mixed-methods study investigated how middle-school mathematics teachers in Al-Ahsa incorporate STEM principles into their teaching and the challenges they encounter. Twenty-five teachers were observed across fifty lessons using an observation checklist derived from the STEM integration in K–12 Education framework, and fifteen teachers participated in semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics captured patterns of practice, while thematic analysis provided deeper interpretive insight. Findings revealed modest levels of STEM integration: interdisciplinary links emerged occasionally, whereas inquiry-based and project-based learning appeared only sporadically. Four interrelated constraints were identified: limited professional preparation, insufficient technological resources, curriculum rigidity, and resistance to pedagogical change. Together, these factors help explain why STEM implementation in the observed context appears more aspirational than routine. The study highlights the need for context-sensitive professional-development models, reliable technological support, and greater curricular flexibility to make integrated STEM pedagogy a sustainable component of mathematics education.
- AlAli, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Enhancing student motivation and achievement in science classrooms through STEM education. STEM Education, 4(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024012
- AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., Saleh, S. & Alshraifin, N. (2024). Evaluation of STEM-aligned teaching practices for gifted mathematics teachers. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 08. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/14625
- Aldahmash, A. H., Alamri, N. M., Aljallal, M. A., Alshamrani, S. M. & Alshamrani, M. (2019). Saudi Arabian science and mathematics teachers’ attitudes toward integrating STEM in teaching before and after participating in a professional development program. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1580852. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1580852
- Al-Dosari, H. (2016). The reality of Saudi Arabia’s experience in STEM education in light of international practices. Proceedings of the First Conference on Excellence in Learning and Teaching Science and Mathematics: STEM Orientation (pp. 599–640). Ministry of Education
- Al-Kaabi, A. & Al-Maskari, S. (2025). Augmented reality (AR) technology: Exploring Omani post-secondary STEM math game. STEM Education, 6(2), e2025044. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025044
- Al-Kahtani, A. (2017). The challenges facing the integration of ICT in teaching in Saudi secondary schools. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 13(1), 32–51. https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ1142266.pdf
- Al-Najjar, R. & Hammad, Y. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of teaching mathematics topics based on STEM educational philosophy: A sequential explanatory design. STEM Education, 6(1), e2024023. https://doi.org/ 10.3934/steme.2024023
- Azhar, A. & Rashid, R.-A. A. (2024). A systematic literature review on K–12 STEM education research in Saudi Arabia: The story of transformation under vision 2030. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.23640
- Bolyard, J., Curtis, R., & Cairns, D. (2023). Learning to struggle: Supporting middle-grade teachers’ understanding of productive struggle in STEM teaching and learning. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 23, 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00302-0
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
- Can, B. H., & Soylu, C. H. (2025). Examining the 5th grade science textbook learning learning units in the context of values: Türkiye century education model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education and Society, 13(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.20897/apjes/17468
- Capraro, R. M., Slough, S. W., Capraro, M. M. & Morgan, J. (2013). STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Brill.
- English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(Suppl 1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
- Eshaq, H. A. (2024). The effect of using STEM education on students’ mathematics achievement. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202423476
- Halawa, S. (2024). Exploring instructional design in K–12 STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00503-5
- Halpern, C., Aydin, H., & Halpern, B. (2025). “Awareness is just the first step”: Preservice teachers’ changing views of teaching multilingual learners in an ESOL course. European Journal of Education & Language Review, 1(1), 4 xx. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/17567
- Honey, M., Pearson, G. & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.) (2014). STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
- Kelley, T. R. & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
- Kim, B. J., Ke, F., Moon, J. & West, L. (2021). Designing dynamic learning supports for game and simulation-based learning in STEM education. In Game-Based Learning Across the Disciplines (pp. 189–212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75142-5_8
- Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2016). Vision 2030. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa
- Kırıcı, M. G., & Bakırcı, H. (2021). The effect of STEM supported research-inquiry-based learning approach on the scientific creativity of 7th grade students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 19-35. https://doi.org/ 10.33902/JPR.2021067921
- Kolakkadan, S. (2024). Islamic piety, corporeality and agency: Young Mappila women’s dissensus over the notion of ideal muslimah in Malabar. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 8(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/14941
- Lazonder, A. W. & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
- Lee, M. Y. (2025). Project-based learning as a catalyst for integrated STEM education: A literature review. Education Sciences, 15(7), 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070871
- Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., Zhao, L. & Xu, K. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
- Lyu, Q., Chiang, F. K. & Davis, J. (2022). Primary and middle school teacher experiences of integrated STEM education in China: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 491–504. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/228479/
- Madani, R. A. (2020). Teaching challenges and perceptions on STEM implementation for schools in Saudi Arabia. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/8468
- Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D. & Perales-Palacios, F. (2022). Project-based STEM education for resilience and adaptability in post-pandemic schooling. Education Sciences, 12(6), 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci12060382
- Nicol, C. (2023). Mathematics education for STEM as place. ZDM Mathematics Education, 55(5), 1159–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01498-z
- Prince, A. (2023). Culturally and socially responsible assessment: theory, research, and practice. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(1), 222-225. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12871
- Saad, R. B., Garcia, A. L. & Garcia, J. M. C. (2025). Sustainable STEM education in Arab countries: Features and challenges. Sustainability, 17(14), 6503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146503
- Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. Technology Teacher, 68, 20–26. http://hdl.handle.net/ 10919/51616
- Sarkar, R. (2025). A review of human-centered AI: A multidisciplinary perspective for policy-makers, auditors, and users. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence and Society, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20897/ jirais/17534
- Suarta, I. M., Noortyani, R., Yarsama, K., & Adhiti, I. A. I. (2022). The role of teachers’ indigenous knowledge and cultural competencies in enhancing students’ engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(1), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1025
- Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), Article 02. https://doi.org/ 10.20897/ejsteme/85525
- Toma, R. B., Yánez-Pérez, I., & Meneses-Villagrán, J. Á. (2024). Towards a socio-constructivist didactic model for integrated STEM education. Interchange, 55, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-024-09513-2
- Wan, Z. H., English, L., So, W. W. M. & Skilling, K. (2023). STEM integration in primary schools: Theory, implementation and impact. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(Suppl 1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10401-x
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Ben-Motreb, 2026)
Reference: Ben-Motreb, K. S. (2026). Beyond teacher perceptions: Classroom evidence of STEM integration in Saudi mathematics education.
European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18040
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ben-Motreb KS. Beyond teacher perceptions: Classroom evidence of STEM integration in Saudi mathematics education.
European Journal of STEM Education. 2026;11(1), 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18040
Chicago
In-text citation: (Ben-Motreb, 2026)
Reference: Ben-Motreb, Khaled S.. "Beyond teacher perceptions: Classroom evidence of STEM integration in Saudi mathematics education".
European Journal of STEM Education 2026 11 no. 1 (2026): 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18040
Harvard
In-text citation: (Ben-Motreb, 2026)
Reference: Ben-Motreb, K. S. (2026). Beyond teacher perceptions: Classroom evidence of STEM integration in Saudi mathematics education.
European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18040
MLA
In-text citation: (Ben-Motreb, 2026)
Reference: Ben-Motreb, Khaled S. "Beyond teacher perceptions: Classroom evidence of STEM integration in Saudi mathematics education".
European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2026, 11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18040
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ben-Motreb KS. Beyond teacher perceptions: Classroom evidence of STEM integration in Saudi mathematics education. European Journal of STEM Education. 2026;11(1):11.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18040