Abstract
STEM projects are integral to STEM education, fostering critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. However, students often struggle with topic selection, methodology, and iterative improvement. This study investigates the integration of Design Thinking (DT) into a year-long STEM project course in a Thai high school, examining how iterative loops impact project originality and feasibility. Using a qualitative approach, data were collected through proposals, progression reports, final reports, and presentations, all of which were analysed using originality and feasibility rubrics. Results revealed that students who engaged in iterative DT processes produced more innovative and practical solutions, while those with minimal iteration faced challenges in originality and feasibility. The findings highlight the importance of structured iteration and feedback in STEM education, providing insights for educators to optimize project-based learning and support effective students in STEM projects.
- Aflatoony, L., Wakkary, R., & Neustaedter, C. (2018). Becoming a design thinker: Assessing the learning process of students in a secondary-level design thinking course. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12139
- Alfarraj, Y., Abdelhady, G., Ahmed, A., Elaasar, M., & Aguilar, J. J. (2026). LoRaWAN-based asset tracking system development and performance analysis within STEM-PBL framework: A mixed-method study. European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17774
- American Society for Quality. (2020). Impact–effort matrix. https://asq.org/quality-resources/impact-effort-matrix
- Amka, A., & Dalle, J. (2022). The Satisfaction of the Special need’ students with e-learning experience during COVID-19 pandemic: A case of educational institutions in Indonesia. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), ep334. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11371
- Balçın, M. D., Çavuş, R., & Yavuz Topaloğlu, M. (2018). Investigation of secondary school students’ attitudes towards STEM and their interest towards professions in STEM fields. Asian Journal of Instruction, 6(2), 40-62. https://doi.org/10.20897/apjes/16988
- Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2019). The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21465
- Bennett, J., Dunlop, L., Knox, K. J., Jenkins, R. T., & Reiss, M. J. (2020). Being a scientist: The role of practical research projects in school science. In Engaging learners with chemistry (pp. 32–51). Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788016087-00032
- Bennett, J., Dunlop, L., Knox, K. J., Reiss, M. J., & Torrance Jenkins, R. (2018). Practical independent STEM projects in science: A synthesis and evaluation of the evidence of impact on high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 40(14), 1755–1773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1511936
- Bicer, A., Lee, Y., & Perihan, C. (2020). Inclusive STEM high school factors influencing ethnic minority students’ STEM preparation. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/384
- Butler, A. G., Lacey, H. P., Roberto, M. A., Hanney, D., & Luiggi, N. (2023). Innovation nation: Teaching middle school students to be design thinkers. Middle School Journal, 54(3), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2023.2185436
- Chesson, D. (2017). Design thinker profile: Creating and validating a scale for measuring design thinking capabilities [Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University].Antioch University Dissertation & Theses.
- Chin, D. B., Blair, K. P., Wolf, R. C., Conlin, L. D., Cutumisu, M., Pfaffman, J., & Schwartz, D. L. (2019). Educating and measuring choice: A test of the transfer of design thinking in problem solving and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(3), 337–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1570933
- Christensen, K. S., Hjorth, M., Iversen, O. S., & Smith, R. C. (2019). Understanding design literacy in middle-school education: Assessing students’ stances towards inquiry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9459-y
- d.school. (2018). d.school bootleg deck. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University. https://dschool.sfo3.digitaloceanspaces.com/documents/dschool_bootleg_deck_2018_final_sm2-6.pdf
- Dam, R. F., & Teo, Y. S. (2025, March 2). What is design thinking and why is it so popular? Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular
- Danial, L., Koenen, J., & Tiemann, R. (2026). critical thinking performance assessment in an undergraduate physical chemistry laboratory course: Developing a contextual critical thinking coding manual. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(1), 37-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17367
- Dotson, M. E., Alvarez, V., Tackett, M., Asturias, G., Leon, I., & Ramanujam, N. (2020). Design thinking-based STEM learning: Preliminary results on achieving scale and sustainability through the Ignite model. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00014
- Fang, S. C., & Fan, S. C. (2025). Students’ opportunities to learn: Exploring junior secondary teachers’ enactments of STEM integration. Research in Science Education, 55(4), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10265-x
- Grewe, F. (2025). The need for diffraction in STEM-fields: An ethical feminist consideration of the concept of gender scripting. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 9(2), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/16786
- Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2009). The guidelines for implementation of additional DPST programs for students in science, mathematics, and technology. Ministry of Education.
- Lin, L., Dong, Y., Chen, X., Shadiev, R., Ma, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). Exploring the impact of design thinking in information technology education: An empirical investigation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101450
- Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.-Y., & Shen, S. (2020). From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100646
- Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K., Tan, O. S., Ee, J., & Koh, C. (2009). Understanding students’ motivation in project work: A 2 × 2 achievement goal approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X313767
- Lor, R. (2017, May 24-26). Design thinking in education: A critical review of literature [Conference session]. International Academic Conference on Social Sciences and Management / Asian Conference on Education and Psychology, Bangkok, Thailand.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324684320_Design_Thinking_ in_Education_A_Critical_Review_of_Literature
- Marks, J., & Chase, C. C. (2019). Impact of a prototyping intervention on middle school students’ iterative practices and reactions to failure. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20294
- Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: How teachers implement projects in K–12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
- Morrison, J., Frost, J., Gotch, C., McDuffie, A. R., Austin, B., & French, B. (2021). Teachers’ role in students’ learning at a project-based STEM high school: Implications for teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(6), 1103–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10108-3
- Nordlöf, C., Norström, P., Schönborn, K. J., & Hallström, J. (2024). Easier said than done: STEM subject integration through engineering design in Swedish upper secondary school. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 24, 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-025-00348-2
- Parker, M., Cruz, L., Gachago, D., & Morkel, J. (2021). Design thinking for challenges and change in K–12 and teacher education. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 24(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1555458920975467
- Rusmann, A., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2022). When design thinking goes to school: A literature review of design competences for the K–12 level. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2063–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09692-4
- Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2022). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1
- Vossen, T. E., Henze, I., Rippe, R. C. A., Van Driel, J. H., & De Vries, M. J. (2018). Attitudes of secondary school students towards doing research and design activities. International Journal of Science Education, 40(13), 1629–1652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1494395
- Vossen, T. E., Tigelaar, E. H., Henze, I., De Vries, M. J., & Van Driel, J. H. (2019). Student and teacher perceptions of the functions of research in the context of a design-oriented STEM module. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(4), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09523-7
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Suriyabutr et al., 2026)
Reference: Suriyabutr, A., Yasri, P., & Chenprakhon, P. (2026). Enhancing STEM education through design thinking and iterative improvement in students’ research projects.
European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 7.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17872
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Suriyabutr A, Yasri P, Chenprakhon P. Enhancing STEM education through design thinking and iterative improvement in students’ research projects.
European Journal of STEM Education. 2026;11(1), 7.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17872
Chicago
In-text citation: (Suriyabutr et al., 2026)
Reference: Suriyabutr, Ariya, Pratchayapong Yasri, and Pirom Chenprakhon. "Enhancing STEM education through design thinking and iterative improvement in students’ research projects".
European Journal of STEM Education 2026 11 no. 1 (2026): 7.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17872
Harvard
In-text citation: (Suriyabutr et al., 2026)
Reference: Suriyabutr, A., Yasri, P., and Chenprakhon, P. (2026). Enhancing STEM education through design thinking and iterative improvement in students’ research projects.
European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 7.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17872
MLA
In-text citation: (Suriyabutr et al., 2026)
Reference: Suriyabutr, Ariya et al. "Enhancing STEM education through design thinking and iterative improvement in students’ research projects".
European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2026, 7.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17872
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Suriyabutr A, Yasri P, Chenprakhon P. Enhancing STEM education through design thinking and iterative improvement in students’ research projects. European Journal of STEM Education. 2026;11(1):7.
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17872