Download: 53
View: 67

Abstract

The fast adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in higher education has led to the realization of the necessity to study the responses of educators as a professional group, although there is limited empirical research, especially in a new educational setting such as Azerbaijan. This pilot study is a quantitative investigation of the attitudes of Azerbaijani university teachers related to GAI, their adaptations in pedagogy, and the perceived difficulties and support requirements. The information was gathered through an online poll (n=30) in a university with a high level of research. Findings indicate that teachers are aware of the opportunities of GAI to personalize learning and administrative efficiency yet were rated moderately on AI literacy (Mean=3.42) and willingness to apply (Mean=3.21). Some of the key issues were academic integrity, the validity of assessment, and AI-assisted plagiarism. The exploratory analysis revealed that there was a good positive correlation between AI literacy and the perceived usefulness (r=0.759), where active adopters redesigned assessments and adopted process-oriented approaches. However, the conceptualization of institutional support was perceived to be inconsistent (Mean=3.04, SD=1.1). The results show that successful GAI implementation must involve contextualized professional growth and straightforward institutional policies that can resolve ethical and pedagogical issues. Although constrained by sample size, this research has given the first signs of the importance of educator-based support to facilitate responsible AI integration into the modernization of higher education.
Figure 1 Figure 1. Conceptual model illustrates the relationships between AI literacy, perceived usefulness, perceived risk, institutional support, and faculty willingness to adopt generative AI in higher education.
  • Abulail, R. N., Badran, O. N., Shkoukani, M. A., & Omeish, F. (2025). Exploring the factors influencing AI adoption intentions in higher education: An integrated model of DOI, TOE, and TAM. Computers, 14(6), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14060230
  • Acar, E., Deiri, Y., & Yigit, F. (2025). A focused review of artificial intelligence in education: Evolution and challenges. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence and Society, 1(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.20897/jirais/17640
  • Adamakis, M., & Rachiotis, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A state-of-the-art overview of pedagogical integrity, artificial intelligence literacy, and policy integration. Encyclopedia, 5(4), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040180
  • Adeleye, O. O., Eden, C. A., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Innovative teaching methodologies in the era of artificial intelligence: A review of inclusive educational practices. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 11(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.2.0091
  • Adikoeswanto, D., Eliyana, A., Syamsudin, N., Budiyanto, S., Arief, Z., & Anwar, A. (2022). The mediation role of adoption readiness on perceived anxiety and attitude toward using database management system at correctional institutions. Heliyon, 8(8), e10027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10027
  • Ahmed, H. (2024). Institutional integration of artificial intelligence in higher education: The moderation effect of ethical consideration. International Journal of Educational Reform. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879241247551
  • Aithal, P. S., & Maiya, A. K. (2023). Innovations in higher education industry–Shaping the future. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education (IJCSBE), 7(4), 283–311. https://doi.org/ 10.47992/ijcsbe.2581.6942.0321
  • Alam, A. (2022). Employing adaptive learning and intelligent tutoring robots for virtual classrooms and smart campuses: Reforming education in the age of artificial intelligence. In Advanced computing and intelligent technologies: Proceedings of ICACIT 2022 (pp. 395–406). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2980-9_32
  • Al-Amri, N. A., & Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2024). Drivers of chatbot adoption among K–12 teachers in Saudi Arabia. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091034
  • Ali, F., Ahmed, A., Alipour, M. A., & Terashima-Marin, H. (2025). Adoption of AI-coding assistants in programming education: Exploring trust and learning motivation through an extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Computers in Education, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-025-00375-w
  • Aliyev, M., & Aliyeva, S. (2024). Revisiting digital transformation of Azerbaijan higher education in the new digital era. Yildiz Social Science Review, 10(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.51803/yssr.1441943
  • Alsharefeen, R., & Al Sayari, N. (2025, June). Examining academic integrity policy and practice in the era of AI: A case study of faculty perspectives. In Frontiers in Education, 10, 1621743. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1621743
  • Alwaqdani, M. (2025). Investigating teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence tools in education: Potential and difficulties. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 2737–2755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12903-9
  • Anthony Jr, B., Kamaludin, A., & Romli, A. (2023). Predicting academic staff’s behavior intention and actual use of blended learning in higher education: Model development and validation. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(3), 1223–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09579-2
  • Arinushkina, A. A. (Ed.). (2024). Integration strategies of generative AI in higher education. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5518-3
  • Arkoumanis, G., Sofos, A., Ventista, O. M., Ventistas, G., & Tsani, P. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on elementary school students’ learning: A meta-analysis. Computers in the Schools, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2025.2520787
  • Aruleba, K., Jere, N., & Matarirano, O. (2022). An evaluation of technology adoption during remote teaching and learning at tertiary institution by gender. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 10(3), 1335–1346. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2022.3163912
  • Asadov, K., & Najafov, R. (2026). Correction and development of speech in children with hearing impairments: Psychological, linguistic, and pedagogical approaches. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems, 9(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.56334/sei/9.1.5
  • Bahadır, F., Yeşiltaş, M., Sesen, H., & Olaleye, B. R. (2024). The relation between perceived organizational support and employee satisfaction: The role of relational psychological contract and reciprocity ideology. Kybernetes, 53(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-04-2022-0520
  • Balaskas, S., Tsiantos, V., Chatzifotiou, S., & Rigou, M. (2025). Determinants of ChatGPT adoption intention in higher education: Expanding on TAM with the mediating roles of trust and risk. Information, 16(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16020082
  • Bjerg, J. (2024). The early-career professional’s guide to generative AI. Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0456-4
  • Blankendaal-Tran, K. N., Meulenbroeks, R. F., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2026). Teachers’ and students’ needs for supporting digital research skills in secondary STEM education. European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17755
  • Bouzaher, S. (2025). Concept of electronic consumer protection and means of safeguarding it amid artificial intelligence applications. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems, 8(11), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.56352/sei/8.11.38
  • Carian, E. K., & Hill, J. D. (2021). Using frameworks of social desirability to teach subjectivity in interviews. Teaching Sociology, 49(4), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x211017195
  • Chaimongkol, T., & Rattanakantadilok, G. (2026). Female representation in the Thai boys' love industry: The intersection of privilege and oppression. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 10(1), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/18174
  • Denisova-Schmidt, E. (2017). The challenges of academic integrity in higher education: Current trends and prospects.
  • Du, Y. (2025). How teachers’ digital literacy influences the intention to use AI teaching tools: An empirical study based on an integrated model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10494820.2025.2538746
  • Gjini, T. W., & Hernandez-Gantes, V. M. (2025). Who Gets to Intern? Demographic and Institutional Predictors of Internship Participation Among International Students. European Journal of Education & Language Review, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejelr/17312
  • Hajiyeva, N. A., Huseynov, R. T., Huseynova, M. R., Mammadova, A. V., & Mammadov, S. J. (2023). Digitalization of education in Azerbaijan. AGORA International Journal of Economical Sciences, 17(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.15837/aijes.v17i2.6450
  • Haroud, S., & Saqri, N. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on support, replacement, and digital literacy. Education Sciences, 15(4), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci15040396
  • Hewavitharana, T., Nanayakkara, S., Perera, A., & Perera, P. (2021, November). Modifying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model for the digital transformation of the construction industry from the user perspective. Informatics, 8(4), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8040081
  • Hien, N. T. T. (2022). Digital economic development in Ho Chi Minh City in the current period. Bank and Policy, 2(1).
  • Jamalova, M. (2025). Adapting to artificial intelligence-related specializations in higher education: Evidence from Azerbaijan. In 2024 Yearbook Emerging Technologies in Learning (pp. 45–69). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80388-8_3
  • Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
  • Katz, N. (2026). Digital inequality in context: A socio-technical analysis of Arab students’ remote learning in Israel. Asia Pacific Journal of Education and Society, 14(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.20897/apjes/17975
  • Kheira, B., & Amina, K. (2025). Applications of artificial intelligence in enhancing the efficiency and innovation of scientific research in higher education institutions. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems, 8(10), 1047–1054. https://doi.org/10.56334/sei/8.10.91
  • Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614
  • Kotsis, K. T. (2025). From chalkboard to chatbot: The future of physics education through artificial intelligence integration. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i2.515
  • Kuzmenko, A. (2024). The modern teacher as a subject in the process of forming future PhDs culture of academic integrity: Tempora mutantur, et nos mutamur in illis. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 63(2). https://doi.org/10.23856/6304
  • Lampropoulos, G., & Papadakis, S. (2025). The educational value of artificial intelligence and social robots. In G. Lampropoulos & S. Papadakis (Eds.), Social robots in education: How to effectively introduce social robots into classrooms (pp. 3–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82915-4_1
  • Lang, Q., Wang, M., Yin, M., Liang, S., & Song, W. (2025). Transforming education with generative AI (GAI): Key insights and future prospects. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/ tlt.2025.3537618
  • Larguet, S. (2025). Legal consultation in the era of artificial intelligence: Challenges of civil liability, ethical accountability, and the redefinition of professional practice in the digital age. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems, 8(11), 907–915. https://doi.org/10.56352/sei/8.11.71
  • Li, J. (2024). Research on the modernization trends in higher education development. International Journal of Educational Teaching and Research, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.70767/ijetr.v1i4.492
  • Ma, S., & Lei, L. (2024). The factors influencing teacher education students’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence technology for information-based teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305155
  • Mateusz, M., Jakub, M., Anna, Ż., Ameen, N., & Tomasz, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence in medical education: A narrative review. AI, 6(12), 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6120322
  • Mehdaoui, A. (2024). Unveiling barriers and challenges of AI technology integration in education: Assessing teachers’ perceptions, readiness and anticipated resistance. Futurity Education, 4(4), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.57125/fed.2024.12.25.06
  • Mohamed, H. R. K. R. (2026). Demystifying artificial intelligence: Comprehensive guide for non-native speakers. In AI's role in language learning and communication (pp. 1–26). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-5681-5.ch001
  • Mohammed, R. R. (2025). Generative AI in the academy: Analysis of stakeholders’ experiences in US higher education organizations (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University). https://doi.org/10.29242/ casestudy.maparizonastate2025
  • Mouta, A., Torrecilla-Sánchez, E. M., & Pinto-Llorente, A. M. (2025). Comprehensive professional learning for teacher agency in addressing ethical challenges of AIED: Insights from educational design research. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 3343–3387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12946-y
  • Najafov, R. (2025). On the sociology of education, management and analysis of the principles of orientation of education in the aspect of socialization of the individual. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems, 8(7), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.56352/sei/8.8.2
  • Nazim, M., & Alzubi, A. A. F. (2025). Empowering EFL teachers’ perceptions of generative AI-mediated self-professionalism. PLoS One, 20(6), e0326735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326735
  • Neway, M. M., & Zegeye, M. B. (2022). Gender differences in the adoption of agricultural technology in North Shewa Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2069209. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2069209
  • Nuri, A., Ismayil, Z., Babayeva, M., Guliyev, A., Rzayeva, F., Shiraliyeva, G., & Jahangirli, T. (2025). Artistic expressions as vehicles of cultural memory. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 12(5), 258–275.
  • O'dea, X., & O'Dea, M. (2023). Is artificial intelligence really the next big thing in learning and teaching in higher education? A conceptual paper. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.5.06
  • Omar, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence and legislative quality: Enhancing legal drafting, simplifying legal language, and addressing ethical and accountability challenges. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems, 8(11), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.56352/sei/8.11.16
  • Pandey, J. K. (2024). Unlocking the power and future potential of generative AI in government transformation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-01-2024-0006
  • Papadakis, S. (2025). Teaching with artificial intelligence. In G. Lampropoulos & S. Papadakis (Eds.), Social robots in education: How to effectively introduce social robots into classrooms (pp. 119–134). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82915-4_8
  • Pyra, M. (2021). Summary of doctoral dissertation: Impact of state higher vocational schools on local development in the Lublin region. Economic and Regional Studies, 12(3), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2019-0031
  • Rajagopal, S., Popat, K., Meva, D., & Bajeja, S. (Eds.). (2024). Advancements in smart computing and information security: Second international conference, ASCIS 2023, Rajkot, India, December 7–9, 2023, revised selected papers, part III (Vol. 2039). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59100-6
  • Raza, F. A., Singh, A. D., Kovilpillai, J. J. S., Hamdan, A., & Rajaratnam, V. (2025). Safeguarding integrity in AI-enhanced education: Stakeholder perspectives on accuracy, validity, and ethics in ASEAN. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17307
  • Rejali, S., Aghabayk, K., Esmaeli, S., & Shiwakoti, N. (2023). Comparison of technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to assess a priori acceptance of fully automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 168, 103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.103565
  • Rozputnia, B., Shevchenko, L., Umanets, V., Yashchuk, S., & Sabadosh, Y. (2025). Methodological approaches to using artificial intelligence to develop creative skills in future designers. In Environment. Technology. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 293–298). https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol2.8596
  • Şahin, Ç. (2024). An evolving energy partnership: The European Union and Azerbaijan. Eurasian Research Journal, 6(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.53277/2519-2442-2024.1-02
  • Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ healthcare11222955
  • Sat, M. (2025). The impact of AI integration in project preparation in education course on pre-service teachers’ innovativeness, AI anxiety, attitudes, and acceptance. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 1297. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03647-3
  • Shakib Kotamjani, S., Shirinova, S., Muratova, K., & Sharma, M. (2024, December). Exploring students' perspectives on generative AI for academic purposes in Uzbekistan's higher education. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems (pp. 986–994). https://doi.org/10.1145/3726122.3726266
  • Shishakly, R. (2025). Understanding AI in higher education: Gendered and intersectional students’ experience with ChatGPT use. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), Article 36. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17646
  • Taimur, A. (2024). Manipulative phantoms in the machine: A legal examination of large language model hallucinations on human opinion formation. In IFIP International Summer School on Privacy and Identity Management (pp. 59–77). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91054-8_3
  • Tariq, M. U. (2024). AI-powered language translation for multilingual classrooms. In Integrating generative AI in education to achieve sustainable development goals (pp. 29–46). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2440-0.ch002
  • Taylor, P. M. (2022). Being a doctoral student: The dissertation stage. In Research anthology on doctoral student professional development (pp. 64–68). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2656-9.ch020
  • Thelma, C. C., Sain, Z. H., Shogbesan, Y. O., Phiri, E. V., & Akpan, W. M. (2024). Digital literacy in education: Preparing students for the future workforce. International Journal of Research, 11(8), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.33650/ijit.v3i1.9364
  • Tran, C., James, B., Allen, V., de Castro, R. O., & Sanin, C. (2025). Using generative artificial intelligence in learning and teaching: An empirical analysis on academic staff’s perspectives. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2025.8.1.23
  • Uğraş, H., Uğraş, M., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2024). Innovative early childhood STEM education with ChatGPT: Teacher perspectives. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09788-6
  • Ullah, N., Mugahed Al-Rahmi, W., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., & Alblehai, F. M. (2021). Blockchain technology adoption in smart learning environments. Sustainability, 13(4), 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041801
  • Wu, W., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Liu, H. (2022). Exploring factors of the willingness to accept AI-assisted learning environments: An empirical investigation based on the UTAUT model and perceived risk theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 870777. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870777
  • Yao, N., & Wang, Q. (2024). Factors influencing pre-service special education teachers’ intention toward AI in education: Digital literacy, teacher self-efficacy, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Heliyon, 10(14). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34894
  • Yener, A. L., Christian, J. D., Chicheportiche, S. J., Rajasekaran, S., Ahmadov, P., & Castro, L. S. (2024). Digitalization of human development services in Europe and Central Asia. The World Bank Group, 42438. https://doi.org/10.1596/42438
  • Zacharis, G., & Papadakis, S. (2025). Can AI grade like a human? Validity, reliability, and fairness in university coursework assessment. Educational Process: International Journal, 19, e2025591. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.19.591
APA 7th edition
In-text citation: (Ismayil et al., 2026)
Reference: Ismayil, Z., Jafarov, A., Adil, G., Soltanova, A., Mansimova, K., Alishanova, A., Gundogdu, S., Hasanova, N., Aliyev, S., Ahmadov, H., Amrahov, Z., & Nuri, A. (2026). Faculty perceptions of generative AI in Azerbaijani higher education. European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18310
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ismayil Z, Jafarov A, Adil G, et al. Faculty perceptions of generative AI in Azerbaijani higher education. European Journal of STEM Education. 2026;11(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18310
Chicago
In-text citation: (Ismayil et al., 2026)
Reference: Ismayil, Zulfiyya, Alvan Jafarov, Geybulla Adil, Aysel Soltanova, Kifayat Mansimova, Aynur Alishanova, Sariyya Gundogdu, Narmin Hasanova, Shafa Aliyev, Humeyir Ahmadov, Ziyad Amrahov, and Alaviyya Nuri. "Faculty perceptions of generative AI in Azerbaijani higher education". European Journal of STEM Education 2026 11 no. 1 (2026): 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18310
Harvard
In-text citation: (Ismayil et al., 2026)
Reference: Ismayil, Z., Jafarov, A., Adil, G., Soltanova, A., Mansimova, K., Alishanova, A., . . . Nuri, A. (2026). Faculty perceptions of generative AI in Azerbaijani higher education. European Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18310
MLA
In-text citation: (Ismayil et al., 2026)
Reference: Ismayil, Zulfiyya et al. "Faculty perceptions of generative AI in Azerbaijani higher education". European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2026, 21. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18310
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ismayil Z, Jafarov A, Adil G, Soltanova A, Mansimova K, Alishanova A, et al. Faculty perceptions of generative AI in Azerbaijani higher education. European Journal of STEM Education. 2026;11(1):21. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/18310
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Submit My Manuscript



Phone: +31 (0)70 2190600 | E-Mail: info@lectitojournals.com

Address: Cultura Building (3rd Floor) Wassenaarseweg 20 2596CH The Hague THE NETHERLANDS

Disclaimer

This site is protected by copyright law. This site is destined for the personal or internal use of our clients and business associates, whereby it is not permitted to copy the site in any other way than by downloading it and looking at it on a single computer, and/or by printing a single hard-copy. Without previous written permission from Lectito BV, this site may not be copied, passed on, or made available on a network in any other manner.

Content Alert

Copyright © 2015-2026 LEUKOS BV All rights reserved.